Ombudsman decision data

We publish data about the final decisions made by ombudsman.

Our Policy Statement sets out why we publish this information.

This data is updated on a rolling quarterly basis and most of our decisions will be published in the quarter after the decision was made.

Each decision remains published for 12 months from the date of publication.

Included in the table below are details of the ombudsman decisions made between 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024.

The CSV file for this information can be found here.

How to use this information


General information

The information in the table below shows:

  • Name of the service provider.
  • Total decisions about the service provider in the last 12 months.

Click on the name to find the details of each complaint.



Choosing a service provider

This information can be used to look at the record of service providers. When you look at the information it's useful to ask:

  • Does a complaint mean the firm provides poor service?

No. It's important to check the data and see if we decided whether the service was reasonable or not.

Also take into account that everyone makes mistakes from time to time. When this happens it is important how the service provider responds to the complaint. The data will also show you whether we thought their own (first-tier) complaints handling process was reasonable or not. You should be able to find information about their complaints process on their website.

  • How big is the provider?

If a provider has more than one complaint with us, it could be because they are a big provider and deal with thousands of cases. In this situation it is not unusual for them to have a few complaints listed with us. Always look at the decision we make, not just the number of complaints.

  • What type of work do they do? 

We know that some legal work, such as personal injury, litigation and criminal work, can be more complex for people to understand and the outcomes might not be what people want. This means that complaints could be more likely, but always check what the outcome of the complaint was first.



Downloading data

If this information is used, for example on comparison sites, we encourage you to signpost to the Legal Ombudsman so consumers have the opportunity to find out more about the complaints data.

 


Please click on the green cross in the table below and this will give you more information about the legal service provider and the total decisions made in the last 12 months.

You will find the green cross in front of the name of the legal service provider.

In the table below, the ‘ombudsman remedy required’ field will be 0 if:

  • the ombudsman did not propose a remedy or

  • the remedy proposed by the ombudsman was equal to, or less than, the remedy offered by the firm before we investigated the complaint.

Where data says N/A, this means the ombudsman found the provider’s service to be reasonable.

Filter results by area of law

Number of firms: 881

Number of decisions: 1256

Name Number Of Decisions Ombudsman Remedy Required
MARY MONSON SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
MAURICE ANDREWS SOLICITORS LTD 1 0
MAXWELL ALVES 1 0
MAYA LAW LTD 1 0
McCARTHY BENNETT HOLLAND SOLICITORS LLP 2 0
MCGARRY & CO 1 0
MCKENZIE BELL LTD 1 0
Milnes Legal Group LTD 1 0
MIR LEGAL LTD 1 0
Miss Alison Lisa Potter of 4 Pump Court 1 0
Miss Catherine Eileen Hewitt of Quartz Barristers Chambers 1 0
Miss Helen Rowan Dawson of 15 New Bridge Street 1 0
Miss Jennifer Jane Swan of Pump Court Chambers 1 0
Miss Lucy-Victoria Davis of Pump Court Chambers 1 0
Miss Raffia Arshad 1 0
Miss Samantha Kane of Holland Park Chambers 1 0
Miss Sharn Fiona Mardner of Bell Yard Chambers 1 0
Miss Sioned Davies of No5 Chambers 1 0
Miss Zoe Ann Rudd of Pump Court Chambers 1 0
MITCHELLS 1 0
MONACO SOLICITORS LTD 2 0
MONARCH SOLICITORS LTD 1 0
MOORE BARLOW LLP 2 0
MORTIMERS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
MOSS SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
Mr Andrew Akuafo Otchie of 12 Old Square Chambers 1 0
Mr Aneurin Brewer of Red Lion Chambers 1 0
Mr Benjamin Arthur Boucher-Giles of Fourteen 1 0
Mr Christopher John Knox of Trinity Chambers 1 0
Mr Daniel Hugh Edwards of Dere Street Barristers 1 0
Mr Darren Mark Snow of Libertas Chambers 1 0
Mr David Robert Claxton of Red Lion Chambers 1 0
Mr Hermann Boeddinghaus of 4 Stone Bldgs 1 0
Mr Jacob Taylor of Doughty Street Chambers 1 0
Mr James David Bruce of The 36 Group 1 0
Mr James Thomas Colin Holmes of Garden Court Chambers 1 0
Mr Jayesh Jotangia 1 0
Mr Jonathan Crispin Dingle 1 0
Mr Jonathan Gabriel French of Exchange Chambers 1 0
Mr Kevin John McNerney of St Johns Buildings 1 0
Mr Liam Michael Ryan of 7BR 1 0
Mr Malcolm John Clarke of King's Bench and Godolphin (KBG) Chambers 1 0
Mr Mark Adrian Symes of Garden Court Chambers 1 0
Mr Mark William Smith of CotswoldBarristers 1 0
Mr Mashood Iqbal of 10 King's Bench Walk 1 0
Mr Michael Craig Smith of Thomas More Chambers 1 0
Mr Michael Mulkerrins of Erimus Chambers 1 0
Mr Miles Haddon Trigg of 4BB 1 0
Mr Nicholas Robert Toms of Doughty Street Chambers 1 0
Mr Peter Michael Wilkinson of 3DJB 1 0
Mr Philip Anthony Sapsford of 4-5 Gray's Inn Square 1 0
Mr Philip Howard Davy 1 0
Mr Pritesh Rathod of 1 Crown Office Row 1 0
Mr Ryan Wayne Clement 1 0
Mr Samuel Benjamin Barnaby Shaw of Drystone Chambers 1 0
Mr Stephen Sijia Du of 7 King's Bench Walk 1 0
Mr Steven David McGarry of St Johns Buildings 1 0
Mr Steven Jeremy Woolf of Gatehouse Chambers Limited 1 0
Mr Theodor Pangraz of Clerksroom (London) 1 0
Mr Warren Brian Bank 1 0
Mrs Anne Elizabeth Ives of Pen-y Worlod Farm 1 0
Mrs Lisa Jane Tuckwell of Trinity Chambers 1 0
Mrs Nicola Jane Martin of 3 PB Barristers 1 0
Ms Camilla Khawaja 1 0
Ms Sara Jabbari of Tanfield Chambers 1 0
MSB SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
Myerson Solicitors LLP 1 0
NAA LAW LTD 1 0
NANTES SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
NAPTHENS LLP 1 0
NATIONAL LAW PARTNERS LIMITED 1 0
NEWSTEAD & WALKER LIMITED 1 0
NGA SOLICITORS 1 0
NICKY GOODMAN & CO LTD 1 0
NOCKOLDS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
OGDEN LYLES & FOX 1 0
OLDHAM MARSH PAGE FLAVELL 1 0
OPTIMAL CLAIM LIMITED 2 0
OSBORNES SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
OTS SOLICITORS LTD 1 0
PANNONE CORPORATE LLP 1 0
PARDOES SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
Parfitt Cresswell 4 0
PARRY LAW 1 0
PATTERSON LAW LIMITED 1 0
PAUL BERG & TAYLOR 1 0
PDA LAW SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
Peacock & Co Solicitors Limited 2 0
Pearson Solicitors and Financial Advisers Ltd 1 0
PENMANS SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
PENNINGTONS MANCHES COOPER LLP 1 0
PETER LYNN & PARTNERS 1 0
PETER PETER & WRIGHT 1 0
PHILLIPS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
PINKNEY GRUNWELLS LAWYERS LLP 2 0
PLEXUS LEGAL LLP 1 0
PRYERS SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
QC Law Ltd 1 0
R T LAW 1 0
RAINER HUGHES 1 0

If you cannot see any information relating to a decision you have selected above, the ombudsman decided that no remedy was required in the case