Ombudsman decision data

We publish data about the final decisions made by ombudsman.

Our Policy Statement sets out why we publish this information.

This data is updated on a rolling quarterly basis and most of our decisions will be published in the quarter after the decision was made.

Each decision remains published for 12 months from the date of publication.

Included in the table below are details of the ombudsman decisions made between 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024.

The CSV file for this information can be found here.

How to use this information


General information

The information in the table below shows:

  • Name of the service provider.
  • Total decisions about the service provider in the last 12 months.

Click on the name to find the details of each complaint.



Choosing a service provider

This information can be used to look at the record of service providers. When you look at the information it's useful to ask:

  • Does a complaint mean the firm provides poor service?

No. It's important to check the data and see if we decided whether the service was reasonable or not.

Also take into account that everyone makes mistakes from time to time. When this happens it is important how the service provider responds to the complaint. The data will also show you whether we thought their own (first-tier) complaints handling process was reasonable or not. You should be able to find information about their complaints process on their website.

  • How big is the provider?

If a provider has more than one complaint with us, it could be because they are a big provider and deal with thousands of cases. In this situation it is not unusual for them to have a few complaints listed with us. Always look at the decision we make, not just the number of complaints.

  • What type of work do they do? 

We know that some legal work, such as personal injury, litigation and criminal work, can be more complex for people to understand and the outcomes might not be what people want. This means that complaints could be more likely, but always check what the outcome of the complaint was first.



Downloading data

If this information is used, for example on comparison sites, we encourage you to signpost to the Legal Ombudsman so consumers have the opportunity to find out more about the complaints data.

 


Please click on the green cross in the table below and this will give you more information about the legal service provider and the total decisions made in the last 12 months.

You will find the green cross in front of the name of the legal service provider.

In the table below, the ‘ombudsman remedy required’ field will be 0 if:

  • the ombudsman did not propose a remedy or

  • the remedy proposed by the ombudsman was equal to, or less than, the remedy offered by the firm before we investigated the complaint.

Where data says N/A, this means the ombudsman found the provider’s service to be reasonable.

Filter results by area of law

Number of firms: 881

Number of decisions: 1256

Name Number Of Decisions Ombudsman Remedy Required
Slater and Gordon UK Limited 15 11
GARNER CANNING LIMITED 12 12
ALISON LAW SOLICITORS LLP 11 8
PCS Legal Limited 11 8
TAYLOR ROSE TTKW LIMITED 11 3
STEVE DAVIES SOLICITORS LTD 10 8
IRWIN MITCHELL LLP 9 3
CARPENTERS LIMITED 8 6
Ackroyd Legal (London) LLP 7 7
JOHN W DAVIES LEGAL LIMITED 7 5
O'NEILL PATIENT SOLICITORS LLP 7 6
SARAH WADDINGTON SOLICITORS LTD 7 7
THOMPSONS SOLICITORS LLP 7 4
CO-OPERATIVE LEGAL SERVICES LIMITED 6 2
DAS LAW LIMITED 6 1
DUNCAN LEWIS SOLICITORS LTD 6 3
LYONS DAVIDSON LIMITED 6 1
STEPHENSONS SOLICITORS LLP 6 3
BEAUMONT ABS LTD 5 5
DLG LEGAL SERVICES LIMITED 5 3
JURY O'SHEA LLP 5 4
NEWMAN LAW LLP 5 5
PROPERTY LEGAL (MANCHESTER) LIMITED 5 2
ALLINGTON HUGHES LIMITED 4 3
CHADWICK LAWRENCE LLP 4 2
CURWENS LLP 4 4
DWF LAW LLP 4 2
HARRISON CLARK RICKERBYS LIMITED 4 3
LAWCOMMERCIAL TRADING LIMITED 4 4
Mr John McLanachan 4 4
OLIVER & CO SOLICITORS LTD 4 3
Parfitt Cresswell 4 0
SHAKESPEARE MARTINEAU LLP 4 1
ASHLEY WILSON SOLICITORS LLP 3 3
Axiom Ince Limited 3 1
BLACKFORDS LLP 3 2
BLACKSTONE SOLICITORS LIMITED 3 2
Bloomsbury Law Solicitors 3 3
BOWER & BAILEY LLP 3 3
CAPE HILL SOLICITORS LIMITED 3 2
CHATTERTONS LEGAL SERVICES LIMITED 3 0
Conveyancing Direct Limited 3 1
CURTIS SOLICITORS LIMITED 3 3
DAVISONS SOLICITORS LIMITED 3 2
EMEA LAW LIMITED 3 3
FORTITUDE LAW 3 3
HARRISON DRURY & CO LTD 3 0
HEALYS LLP 3 2
Hennah Haywood Law 3 2
HODDERS LAW LIMITED 3 3
HODGE JONES & ALLEN SOLICITORS LIMITED 3 0
HORWICH COHEN COGHLAN LTD 3 2
HUMPHRIES KIRK LLP 3 1
Jason Elliott Associates Limited 3 3
Jones Whyte LLP 3 3
JOSIAH HINCKS SOLICITORS 3 2
Kings Court Trust Ltd 3 3
MFG SOLICITORS LLP 3 2
MLL Limited 3 2
MSP LEGAL SERVICES LLP 3 3
NR LEGAL SOLICITORS LIMITED 3 2
Premier Property Lawyers Limited 3 2
Premier Property Lawyers Ltd 3 3
SETFORDS LAW LTD 3 1
SINCLAIRSLAW LIMITED 3 2
STAR LEGAL LIMITED 3 1
STEPHENS SCOWN LLP 3 1
STOWE FAMILY LAW LLP 3 0
THE J M PRACTICE LIMITED 3 0
THE WILKES PARTNERSHIP LLP 3 2
VIRGO CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD 3 3
WATSON RAMSBOTTOM LIMITED 3 3
WELLS BURCOMBE LLP 3 2
ADAM DOUGLAS LEGAL LLP 2 2
ADAMSONS LAW LIMITED 2 2
Alan Kerr 2 2
Alexander Grace Law Limited 2 1
AVENTUS LAW LIMITED 2 1
AWH LEGAL LTD 2 0
BATTRICK CLARK SOLICITORS LTD 2 1
BBH (LEGAL SERVICES) LIMITED 2 1
BEST SOLICITORS 2 1
BESWICKS SOLICITORS LLP 2 1
BIRKETTS LLP 2 1
BLAKE MORGAN LLP 2 0
BLANDY & BLANDY LLP 2 1
BRAY & BRAY 2 2
BURD WARD SOLICITORS LIMITED 2 2
Burnetts Solicitors LLP 2 0
CALLISTES 2 0
CANDEY LAW LLP 2 0
CLIFTON LAW LTD 2 2
Connect2Law Limited 2 2
Convey Law Ltd 2 1
Core Legal Limited 2 2
DACK PEARSON SOLICITORS 2 2
DAVIES BLUNDEN & EVANS 2 2
DIRECTION HOME (LAW) LLP 2 2
DPH LEGAL LIMITED 2 0
E S N SOLICITORS 2 2

If you cannot see any information relating to a decision you have selected above, the ombudsman decided that no remedy was required in the case