Ombudsman decision data

We publish data about the final decisions made by ombudsman.

Our Policy Statement sets out why we publish this information.

This data is updated on a rolling quarterly basis and most of our decisions will be published in the quarter after the decision was made.

Each decision remains published for 12 months from the date of publication.

Included in the table below are details of the ombudsman decisions made between 1 January 2024 – 31 December 2024.

The CSV file for this information can be found here.

How to use this information


General information

The information in the table below shows:

  • Name of the service provider.
  • Total decisions about the service provider in the last 12 months.

Click on the name to find the details of each complaint.



Choosing a service provider

This information can be used to look at the record of service providers. When you look at the information it's useful to ask:

  • Does a complaint mean the firm provides poor service?

No. It's important to check the data and see if we decided whether the service was reasonable or not.

Also take into account that everyone makes mistakes from time to time. When this happens it is important how the service provider responds to the complaint. The data will also show you whether we thought their own (first-tier) complaints handling process was reasonable or not. You should be able to find information about their complaints process on their website.

  • How big is the provider?

If a provider has more than one complaint with us, it could be because they are a big provider and deal with thousands of cases. In this situation it is not unusual for them to have a few complaints listed with us. Always look at the decision we make, not just the number of complaints.

  • What type of work do they do? 

We know that some legal work, such as personal injury, litigation and criminal work, can be more complex for people to understand and the outcomes might not be what people want. This means that complaints could be more likely, but always check what the outcome of the complaint was first.



Downloading data

If this information is used, for example on comparison sites, we encourage you to signpost to the Legal Ombudsman so consumers have the opportunity to find out more about the complaints data.

 


Please click on the green cross in the table below and this will give you more information about the legal service provider and the total decisions made in the last 12 months.

You will find the green cross in front of the name of the legal service provider.

In the table below, the ‘ombudsman remedy required’ field will be 0 if:

  • the ombudsman did not propose a remedy or

  • the remedy proposed by the ombudsman was equal to, or less than, the remedy offered by the firm before we investigated the complaint.

Where data says N/A, this means the ombudsman found the provider’s service to be reasonable.

Filter results by area of law

Number of firms: 894

Number of decisions: 1267

Name Number Of Decisions Ombudsman Remedy Required
DELPHINE PHILIP LAW LIMITED 1 0
DC KAYE SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
DAWSON CORNWELL 1 0
DAVISONS SOLICITORS LIMITED 5 4
DAVIS SIMMONDS & DONAGHEY 1 0
DAVIS GREGORY LIMITED 1 0
DAVIS BLANK FURNISS LLP 1 0
DAVID WATKINS LEGAL LIMITED 1 0
DAVID GRAY SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
DAVID EBERT LLP 1 1
DAS LAW LIMITED 5 3
DARWIN BOWIE LIMITED 1 1
DARBY & DARBY 1 1
DANIEL & BAKER SOLICITORS LTD 1 0
DALE AND NEWBERY LLP 1 1
DACK PEARSON SOLICITORS 1 1
Dack Pearson and Company Limited 1 1
D & N SOLICITORS 1 0
CURZON GREEN SOLICITORS 3 1
CURWENS LLP 2 2
Curtis Law Solicitors Limited 1 0
CURTIS LAW LLP 1 1
CUNNINGTONS LLP 2 0
CULLIMORE DUTTON SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
CRUICKSHANK LIMITED 1 0
Crown Gate Law Solicitors 2 2
CROSS BORDER LAW LIMITED 1 1
CROSBY & WOODS SOLICITORS 1 1
CRIPPS LLP 2 1
CRIMINAL DEFENCE MILTON KEYNES SOLICITORS LTD 1 0
CREE GODFREY & WOOD 1 1
CORDELL AND CORDELL UK LIMITED 1 1
CORDELL & CO 1 1
COOLE BEVIS LLP 2 2
COOK TAYLOR WOODHOUSE LIMITED 1 1
COODES LLP 2 1
Convey Law Ltd. 2 1
CONSUMER RIGHTS SOLICITORS LTD 2 2
CONSTANTINE LAW LIMITED 1 0
CONSILIA LEGAL LEEDS LTD 1 0
Connect2Law Limited 2 1
COHEN CRAMER LIMITED 1 0
COCKBURN GOSTLING 1 1
CO-OPERATIVE LEGAL SERVICES LIMITED 2 1
CLYDE SOLICITORS LTD 1 0
CLP Solicitors 1 1
CLP Group Limited 2 1
CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE SERVICES LIMITED 1 0
CLIFTON LAW LTD 2 1
CLIFTON INGRAM LLP 2 2
CLEGGS SOLICITORS 2 2
CLARKE WILLMOTT LLP 1 0
CLARKE ROWE SOLICITORS LTD 1 0
Clarke Mairs Law Limited 1 0
CLARK WILLIS SOLICITORS LTD 1 0
CLARK BROOKES TURNER CARY LIMITED 1 1
CLAPHAM & COLLINGE LLP 1 1
CHIVERS SOLICITORS 1 0
CHHOKAR & CO 1 1
CHESHIRE LAW ASSOCIATES (UK) LTD 1 1
CHATTERTONS LEGAL SERVICES LIMITED 1 0
Chartahouse Ltd 1 1
CHARSLEY HARRISON LLP 1 1
CHARLES RUSSELL SPEECHLYS LLP 1 0
CHAFES HAGUE LAMBERT LLP 1 0
CHADWICK LAWRENCE LLP 3 2
CGM HAMPSHIRE LIMITED 1 1
CARR & CO SOLICITORS (N.E.) LIMITED 1 1
CARPENTERS LIMITED 6 6
Caroline Coats & co 1 0
CARDIFF LAW LTD 2 2
CAPE HILL SOLICITORS LIMITED 2 1
CAMBRIDGE SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
C NICHOLLS SOLICITORS 1 1
C & G SOLICITORS 1 0
C W HARWOOD & CO LIMITED 1 0
BUTTERWORTHS 2 2
BUTTERS DAVID GREY LLP 1 1
BUTCHER AND BARLOW LLP 4 0
BURTONS SOLICITORS LIMITED 2 2
BURTON COPELAND LLP 1 0
Burton & Co LLP 1 1
Burnetts Solicitors LLP 3 1
BURD WARD SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
BUCKLES SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
BTMK SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
BRYAN & ARMSTRONG 1 0
BRUNTON & CO. (Incorporating D. EMRYS WILLIAMS & CO.) 1 1
BROWN TURNER ROSS LIMITED 1 1
BROWELL SMITH & CO SOLICITORS LTD 1 1
BROOKS LAW LIMITED 1 0
BROMLEYS SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
BROMETS JACKSON HEATH LLP 1 1
BRIDGER & CO LIMITED 2 2
BRIDGE MCFARLAND LLP 2 0
BREWER HARDING & ROWE SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
BRETHERTONS LLP 1 0
BRETHERTON LAW LTD 1 0
BREESE GWYNDAF 1 0
BRAR & CO LTD 1 1

If you cannot see any information relating to a decision you have selected above, the ombudsman decided that no remedy was required in the case