Ombudsman decision data

We publish data about the final decisions made by ombudsman.

Our Policy Statement sets out why we publish this information.

This data is updated on a rolling quarterly basis and most of our decisions will be published in the quarter after the decision was made.

Each decision remains published for 12 months from the date of publication.

Included in the table below are details of the ombudsman decisions made between 1 January 2024 – 31 December 2024.

The CSV file for this information can be found here.

How to use this information


General information

The information in the table below shows:

  • Name of the service provider.
  • Total decisions about the service provider in the last 12 months.

Click on the name to find the details of each complaint.



Choosing a service provider

This information can be used to look at the record of service providers. When you look at the information it's useful to ask:

  • Does a complaint mean the firm provides poor service?

No. It's important to check the data and see if we decided whether the service was reasonable or not.

Also take into account that everyone makes mistakes from time to time. When this happens it is important how the service provider responds to the complaint. The data will also show you whether we thought their own (first-tier) complaints handling process was reasonable or not. You should be able to find information about their complaints process on their website.

  • How big is the provider?

If a provider has more than one complaint with us, it could be because they are a big provider and deal with thousands of cases. In this situation it is not unusual for them to have a few complaints listed with us. Always look at the decision we make, not just the number of complaints.

  • What type of work do they do? 

We know that some legal work, such as personal injury, litigation and criminal work, can be more complex for people to understand and the outcomes might not be what people want. This means that complaints could be more likely, but always check what the outcome of the complaint was first.



Downloading data

If this information is used, for example on comparison sites, we encourage you to signpost to the Legal Ombudsman so consumers have the opportunity to find out more about the complaints data.

 


Please click on the green cross in the table below and this will give you more information about the legal service provider and the total decisions made in the last 12 months.

You will find the green cross in front of the name of the legal service provider.

In the table below, the ‘ombudsman remedy required’ field will be 0 if:

  • the ombudsman did not propose a remedy or

  • the remedy proposed by the ombudsman was equal to, or less than, the remedy offered by the firm before we investigated the complaint.

Where data says N/A, this means the ombudsman found the provider’s service to be reasonable.

Filter results by area of law

Number of firms: 895

Number of decisions: 1268

Name Number Of Decisions Ombudsman Remedy Required
MFT SOLICITORS 1 1
Michael Day Licensed Conveyancers 1 1
MICHAEL LEIGHTON JONES SOLICITORS 1 1
MICHAEL TAYLOR & CO 1 0
MICHELMORES LLP 1 1
MIDDLESEX LAW CHAMBERS 1 1
MILES & PARTNERS LLP 1 0
Miles Preston 1 1
MILLS & REEVE LLP 1 0
MINAHAN HIRST & CO LIMITED 1 0
MINARDS PAVLOU 1 0
MINSTER LAW LIMITED 2 0
MIR LEGAL LTD 1 1
MIRKWOOD EVANS VINCENT LTD 1 1
Miss Catherine Eileen Hewitt of Quartz Barristers Chambers 1 0
Miss Karen Rosalie Boyes of Erimus Chambers 1 1
Miss Larysa Simak of 12 Old Square Chambers 1 1
Miss Lynne Shirley of Drystone Chambers 1 0
Miss Sioned Davies of No5 Chambers 1 0
Miss Tanya Rosemary Jones of Magdalen Chambers 1 1
Miss Yvonne Mary Healing of 18 St John Street 1 1
MLL Limited 5 3
MONACO SOLICITORS LTD 2 0
MOORE BARLOW LLP 3 3
Mordi & Co 1 1
MORECROFTS LLP 1 0
Morr & Co LLP 1 1
MOSELEYS 1 1
Mr Adal Ibrar 1 1
Mr Andrew Akuafo Otchie of 12 Old Square Chambers 2 0
Mr Andrew Buchan of Cloisters 1 0
Mr Andrew Richard Clark of 9 St John Street 1 1
Mr Benjamin Arthur Boucher-Giles of Fourteen 1 0
Mr Carl Amir-Ul Islam of Chambers of Ian Mayes QC 1 1
Mr Charles Christopher Holland of Trinity Chambers 1 0
Mr Christopher Edward Machin of Park Square Barristers 1 0
Mr Christopher James Yuen Kang Bryden of 4 King's Bench Walk 1 0
Mr Daniel Ceri Lewis of 3 Hare Court 1 1
Mr David Andrew Stockill of St Philips Chambers 1 1
Mr Gavin Hamilton of 3PB Barristers 1 0
Mr Gerard Pitt of Garden Court Chambers 1 1
Mr Gregory Hamilton Dowell of Whitechapel Chambers 1 1
Mr Haresh Sood of Haresh Sood Law Chambers Ltd 1 0
Mr James David Bruce of The 36 Group 1 0
Mr James Francis Gibbons of Three Stone 1 0
Mr James Fraser Oliveira-Agnew of Lamb Building Chambers Limited 1 1
Mr James Thomas Colin Holmes of Garden Court Chambers 1 0
Mr Jeremy Patrick Wainwright of 3 Temple Gardens 1 0
Mr Jeremy Richard Dable of Normanton Chambers 1 0
Mr John Edward Gerard Hudson of Quartz Barristers Chambers 1 1
Mr John McLanachan 8 8
Mr Jonathan Paul Dale of 18 St John Street 1 0
Mr Joseph Christopher Switalski of 29 Bedford Row Chambers 1 0
Mr Kieran Michael Joseph O'Neill of Trinity Chambers 1 1
Mr Mashood Iqbal of 10 King's Bench Walk 1 0
Mr Michael Ian Wolkind 1 1
Mr Michael Mulkerrins of Erimus Chambers 1 0
Mr Mohammed Latif 2 2
Mr Mohammed Omar Faruk of 19 Coombewood Drive 1 0
Mr Nicholas John Elcombe of East Anglian Chambers 1 0
Mr Patrick John Harrington 1 1
Mr Paul Antony Turner 1 1
Mr Paul Harris of Cornwall Street Barristers 1 0
Mr Paul Ivan William Wilmshurst of New Square Chambers 1 0
Mr Peter Michael Wilkinson of 3DJB 1 0
Mr Peter Wareing of Bell Yard Chambers 2 2
Mr Peter Woodall 1 1
Mr Philip Anthony Sapsford of 4-5 Gray's Inn Square 1 0
Mr Philip Howard Davy 1 0
Mr Reginald Leon Arkhurst 1 1
Mr Richard Henry Norman of St John's Chambers 1 0
Mr Robert James Sheridan of Colleton Chambers 1 0
Mr Robert James Trevis of Queen Square Chambers 1 0
Mr Roderick Spinks 1 0
Mr Simon Jeremy Gerhard Crabtree of St Johns Buildings 1 0
Mr Stephen Sijia Du of 7 King's Bench Walk 1 0
Mr Stephen Vullo 1 0
Mr Timothy George Christie Becker 2 1
Mrs Carol Elaine Wright of Lammas Park Chambers 1 0
Mrs Grace Emily Holden of 3 PB Barristers 1 0
Mrs Kossar Kitching of Trinity Chambers 1 0
Mrs Lisa Jane Tuckwell of Trinity Chambers 1 0
Ms Camilla Khawaja 1 0
Ms Deborah Jane Hay of Chambers of Deborah Hay 1 1
Ms Ella Cantor-Freedman of The Barrister Group (Taunton) 1 0
Ms Esther Cantor 1 0
Ms Felicity Goldsbrough 2 1
Ms Hala Mohamed Kamel Mustafa of Coram Chambers 1 0
Ms Neeta Amin 1 0
Ms Sheren Guirguis of Exchange Chambers 1 0
MSP LEGAL SERVICES LLP 2 2
MTG SOLICITORS 2 2
Murray Hay LLP 1 1
NALDERS LLP 2 1
NANTES SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
NAPTHENS LLP 1 1
National Accident Law Limited 1 0
NATIONAL LAWYER SERVICES 3 2
NELSON LEGAL LLP 1 0
NELSONS SOLICITORS LIMITED 7 5

If you cannot see any information relating to a decision you have selected above, the ombudsman decided that no remedy was required in the case