Ombudsman decision data

We publish data about the final decisions made by ombudsman.

Our Policy Statement sets out why we publish this information.

This data is updated on a rolling quarterly basis and most of our decisions will be published in the quarter after the decision was made.

Each decision remains published for 12 months from the date of publication.

Included in the table below are details of the ombudsman decisions made between 1 October 2024 – 30 September 2025.

The CSV file for this information can be found here.

How to use this information


General information

The information in the table below shows:

  • Name of the service provider.
  • Total decisions about the service provider in the last 12 months.

Click on the name to find the details of each complaint.



Choosing a service provider

This information can be used to look at the record of service providers. When you look at the information it's useful to ask:

  • Does a complaint mean the firm provides poor service?

No. It's important to check the data and see if we decided whether the service was reasonable or not.

Also take into account that everyone makes mistakes from time to time. When this happens it is important how the service provider responds to the complaint. The data will also show you whether we thought their own (first-tier) complaints handling process was reasonable or not. You should be able to find information about their complaints process on their website.

  • How big is the provider?

If a provider has more than one complaint with us, it could be because they are a big provider and deal with thousands of cases. In this situation it is not unusual for them to have a few complaints listed with us. Always look at the decision we make, not just the number of complaints.

  • What type of work do they do? 

We know that some legal work, such as personal injury, litigation and criminal work, can be more complex for people to understand and the outcomes might not be what people want. This means that complaints could be more likely, but always check what the outcome of the complaint was first.



Downloading data

If this information is used, for example on comparison sites, we encourage you to signpost to the Legal Ombudsman so consumers have the opportunity to find out more about the complaints data.

 


Please click on the green cross in the table below and this will give you more information about the legal service provider and the total decisions made in the last 12 months.

You will find the green cross in front of the name of the legal service provider.

In the table below, the ‘ombudsman remedy required’ field will be 0 if:

  • the ombudsman did not propose a remedy or

  • the remedy proposed by the ombudsman was equal to, or less than, the remedy offered by the firm before we investigated the complaint.

Where data says N/A, this means the ombudsman found the provider’s service to be reasonable.

Filter results by area of law

Number of firms: 738

Number of decisions: 1043

Name Number Of Decisions Ombudsman Remedy Required
HARPER & ODELL 1 1
HARRISON CLARK RICKERBYS LIMITED 2 1
HARTLAW LLP 1 1
Hawkins Ryan LLP 1 1
HAWKSLEYS LAW LIMITED 1 1
Hayward Moon Limited 1 1
HCR Legal LLP 3 1
HEALYS LLP 1 1
HEDLEYS & CO 1 1
HEK JONES LIMITED 1 1
Hennah Haywood Law Ltd 2 1
HENRY HYAMS LIMITED 2 1
HERINGTONS LLP 1 1
HERRINGTON CARMICHAEL LLP 2 1
HESELWOOD & GRANT SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
HETTS 1 1
High Street Solicitors Ltd 1 1
HKB WILTSHIRES 1 1
HODGE HALSALL SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
Hooper Burrowes Legal Limited 1 1
Hopleys GMA incorporating Keene and Kelly 1 1
HORSEY LIGHTLY 1 1
HOWELLS LEGAL LIMITED 2 1
HS LEGAL SOLICITORS LTD 1 1
HUGH JAMES 2 1
HUMPHREYS & CO 1 1
IAN HENERY SOLICITORS LTD 1 1
INCE GORDON DADDS LLP 1 1
INFINITY LAW LIMITED 1 1
J W HUGHES & CO LLP 1 1
JACKLYN DAWSON 1 1
JACKSONS COMMERCIAL & PRIVATE LAW LLP 1 1
Jacqueline Theresa McKenzie 1 1
JAMIESON ALEXANDER LIMITED 1 1
JEROME & CO SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
JOHN COPLAND & SON 1 1
JOHNS AND SAGGAR LLP 1 1
JOHNSONS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
JONES SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
KELSALL & COMPANY 1 1
KENNEDYS LAW LLP 1 1
KEOGHS LLP 1 1
KEOGHS NICHOLLS LINDSELL & HARRIS LLP 1 1
Keystone Law Limited 1 1
KHAN MATHER LTD 1 1
KHOKHAR SOLICITORS 1 1
KIDD RAPINET LLP 1 1
KIDWELLS LAW SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
KIRWANS 1 1
KNOCKER & FOSKETT 1 1
KNOWLES BENNING LLP 1 1
KYRIAKIDES & BRAIER 1 1
LAKE JACKSON 1 1
LAM & MEERABUX SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
LAVEER LEGAL LIMITED 1 1
Law Direct Limited 1 1
LAW LANE SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
LAYTONS LLP 1 1
LEADENHALL LAW GROUP LTD 1 1
LEDGISTERS LIMITED 1 1
LEE & COMPANY 1 1
LEE BOLTON MONIER-WILLIAMS LLP 1 1
LEEDS DAY LLP 1 1
LEGAL NATIONAL LIMITED 1 1
LEXTON LAW SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
LM TRUSTEES LIMITED 1 1
LMK LAW 1 1
LOSS LEGAL SERVICES LTD 2 1
LOUND MULRENAN JEFFERIES SOLICITORS 1 1
LYNCH HALL & HORNBY 1 1
MADDOX LEGAL LIMITED 1 1
MAJORLAW LIMITED 1 1
MANDY PETERS SOLICITORS 1 1
Market Street Law Limited 1 1
MARSDEN RAWSTHORN SOLICITORS LIMITED 2 1
Marshall Hall Levy Limited 1 1
MAWDSLEYS 1 1
MAXWELL HODGE LIMITED 1 1
MAYA & CO SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
MB LEGAL SERVICES LIMITED 1 1
ME LAW 1 1
MEABY & CO SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
Mellen & Co. Limited 1 1
Merali Beedle Limited 1 1
MERRILS EDE 1 1
MFG SOLICITORS LLP 2 1
Michael Day Licensed Conveyancers 1 1
Miles Preston 1 1
MIR LEGAL LTD 1 1
Miss Anna Claire Ratcliffe of Coram Chambers 1 1
Miss Karen Rosalie Boyes of Erimus Chambers 1 1
Miss Larysa Simak of 12 Old Square Chambers 1 1
Miss Tanya Rosemary Jones of Magdalen Chambers 1 1
Miss Yvonne Mary Healing of 18 St John Street 1 1
MKB SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
MOGERS DREWETT LLP 1 1
MOLESWORTHS BRIGHT CLEGG 1 1
MOSELEY CHAPMAN & SKEMP SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
Mr Adal Ibrar 1 1
Mr Dingle Clark of Goldsmith Chambers 1 1

If you cannot see any information relating to a decision you have selected above, the ombudsman decided that no remedy was required in the case