Ombudsman decision data

We publish data about the final decisions made by ombudsman.

Our Policy Statement sets out why we publish this information.

This data is updated on a rolling quarterly basis and most of our decisions will be published in the quarter after the decision was made.

Each decision remains published for 12 months from the date of publication.

Included in the table below are details of the ombudsman decisions made between 1 January 2025 – 31 December 2025.

The CSV file for this information can be found here.

How to use this information


General information

The information in the table below shows:

  • Name of the service provider.
  • Total decisions about the service provider in the last 12 months.

Click on the name to find the details of each complaint.



Choosing a service provider

This information can be used to look at the record of service providers. When you look at the information it's useful to ask:

  • Does a complaint mean the firm provides poor service?

No. It's important to check the data and see if we decided whether the service was reasonable or not.

Also take into account that everyone makes mistakes from time to time. When this happens it is important how the service provider responds to the complaint. The data will also show you whether we thought their own (first-tier) complaints handling process was reasonable or not. You should be able to find information about their complaints process on their website.

  • How big is the provider?

If a provider has more than one complaint with us, it could be because they are a big provider and deal with thousands of cases. In this situation it is not unusual for them to have a few complaints listed with us. Always look at the decision we make, not just the number of complaints.

  • What type of work do they do? 

We know that some legal work, such as personal injury, litigation and criminal work, can be more complex for people to understand and the outcomes might not be what people want. This means that complaints could be more likely, but always check what the outcome of the complaint was first.



Downloading data

If this information is used, for example on comparison sites, we encourage you to signpost to the Legal Ombudsman so consumers have the opportunity to find out more about the complaints data.

 


Please click on the green cross in the table below and this will give you more information about the legal service provider and the total decisions made in the last 12 months.

You will find the green cross in front of the name of the legal service provider.

In the table below, the ‘ombudsman remedy required’ field will be 0 if:

  • the ombudsman did not propose a remedy or

  • the remedy proposed by the ombudsman was equal to, or less than, the remedy offered by the firm before we investigated the complaint.

Where data says N/A, this means the ombudsman found the provider’s service to be reasonable.

Filter results by area of law

Number of firms: 680

Number of decisions: 982

Name Number Of Decisions Ombudsman Remedy Required
Miss Joy Brereton of 4 Paper Bldgs 1 0
Miss Samantha Kane of Holland Park Chambers 1 0
Miss Sarah Tiffany Munro of St Mary's Family Law Chambers 1 0
MITCHELLS 1 0
MIYA Limited 1 0
MJP CONVEYANCING LIMITED 1 0
MKB SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
MLL Limited 3 2
MOGERS DREWETT LLP 1 1
MOLESWORTHS BRIGHT CLEGG 1 1
Morr & Co LLP 3 2
MORTONS LAW LIMITED 1 0
MOSELEY CHAPMAN & SKEMP SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
MOSS BEACHLEY MULLEM AND COLEMAN LIMITED 1 1
Mr Adam John Dutton Budworth of 2 Bedford Row 1 0
Mr Asim Hussain of The Barrister Group (Manchester) 1 1
Mr Balahl Khan of The Barrister Group (Taunton) 1 0
Mr Christopher Bryan Jeyes of Drystone Chambers 1 0
Mr Christopher Stephen Moss of St Johns Buildings 1 0
Mr Dingle Clark of Goldsmith Chambers 1 1
Mr George Charles Patros of 2 King's Bench Walk 1 1
Mr Graeme Wood 3 1
Mr Gregory Hamilton Dowell of Whitechapel Chambers 1 1
Mr Gwynn Price Rowlands of 4 King's Bench Walk 1 1
Mr Haresh Sood of Haresh Sood Law Chambers 1 0
Mr John Joseph Mac Lucas 1 1
Mr John McLanachan 15 14
Mr John Patrick King of 9 Bedford Row 1 0
Mr John William Nathaniel Rundall of 1GC|Family Law 1 0
Mr Joseph John Bela Leslie Giret of 1EC Barristers 1 0
Mr Kwabena Owusu of Flat 1 1 1
Mr Kwabena Owusu of Paul Street Chambers 1 1
Mr Marcus James Croskell 1 1
Mr Martin Mintah Mensah of Nine Chambers 1 1
Mr Michael David Collard of 5 Pump Court 1 0
Mr Michael Peter Levy of 2 Bedford Row 1 1
Mr Michael Stephen Cane-Soothill of Bank House Chambers 1 0
Mr Omar Sherif Ensaff of No5 Chambers 1 0
Mr Peter Anthony Corrigan of Mountford Chambers 1 0
Mr Peter Wareing of Bell Yard Chambers 1 0
Mr Philip Arnes Bowen of The Barrister Group (Taunton) 1 0
Mr Samuel Nwabueze Okoronkwo of Mercantile Chambers 1 0
Mr Sarbjit Singh Boora of Cornwall Street Barristers 1 0
Mr Simon Howard Brilliant of Lamb Chambers 1 0
Mr Simon William Edward Charles of St Johns Buildings 1 0
Mrs Anjulika Vatish of 3 Bolt Court 1 0
Mrs Pauline Grace Lewis 1 1
Ms Amratpal Kaur Matharu of 12 Old Square Chambers 1 0
Ms Ceri Ann White of 4 Paper Bldgs 1 0
MSP LEGAL SERVICES LLP 1 1
Mullis & Peake LLP 1 1
MYERS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
MYERSON SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
NALDERS LLP 1 0
NATHAN & CO 1 0
National Accident Law Limited 1 1
NATIONAL LAWYER SERVICES 1 1
New Homes Law Ltd 2 0
NEWLAW LEGAL LIMITED 2 1
NEWMANS SOLICITORS LIMITED 2 2
NEWNHAM & JORDAN SOLICITORS LTD 1 0
Nhlex Limited 2 2
NIGEL BROADHEAD MYNARD 6 6
NORTH FORD SOLICITORS LTD 1 1
O'Hara Solicitors Limited 1 1
O'NEILL PATIENT SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
Oakwood Solicitors Limited 1 0
OBASEKI & CO LTD 1 1
Ocean Property Lawyers Ltd 1 1
ODT PROFESSIONAL LIMITED 1 1
OLIVER D'SA 1 1
OPTIMA LEGAL SERVICES LIMITED 6 4
Optimal Solicitors Ltd 2 0
ORR LITCHFIELD SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
OSBORNES SOLICITORS LLP 2 1
OTTEN PENNA LIMITED 1 1
Palmers Law Limited 1 1
PALMERS SOLICITORS BEDFORD LIMITED 1 1
Parfitt Cresswell 1 0
PARIS SMITH LLP 1 0
Parkerwall Limited 1 1
PARKINSON WRIGHT LLP 1 0
PARROTT & COALES LLP 1 1
PARRY CARVER 1 1
PARRY LAW 1 1
PATEL & CO 1 1
PCB SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
PCS Legal 1 1
PCS Legal Limited 4 2
PEACE LEGAL LIMITED 1 1
PEARSON HARDS LLP 1 1
PELLYS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
PEMBRIDGE SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
PENNINE KENNEDY LIMITED 2 2
PENNINGTONS MANCHES COOPER LLP 2 1
PERCY SHORT & CUTHBERT LLP 1 1
Perduco Law Group LLP 1 0
Perduco Law Ltd 2 2
PETER DUNN & CO LIMITED 1 0
PETER LYNN & PARTNERS 1 1

If you cannot see any information relating to a decision you have selected above, the ombudsman decided that no remedy was required in the case