Ombudsman decision data

We publish data about the final decisions made by our ombudsmen.

Our Policy Statement sets out why we publish this information.

This data is updated on a rolling quarterly basis and most of our decisions will be published in the quarter after the decision was made.

Each decision remains published for 12 months from the date of publication.

Included in the table below are details of the ombudsman decisions made between 1 July 2025 – 30 June 2026.

The CSV file for this information can be found here.

How to use this information


General information

The information in the table below shows:

  • Name of the service provider.
  • Total decisions about the service provider in the last 12 months.

Click on the name to find the details of each complaint.



Choosing a service provider

This information can be used to look at the record of service providers. When you look at the information it's useful to ask:

  • Does a complaint mean the firm provides poor service?

No. It's important to check the data and see if we decided whether the service was reasonable or not.

Also take into account that everyone makes mistakes from time to time. When this happens it is important how the service provider responds to the complaint. The data will also show you whether we thought their own (first-tier) complaints handling process was reasonable or not. You should be able to find information about their complaints process on their website.

  • How big is the provider?

If a provider has more than one complaint with us, it could be because they are a big provider and deal with thousands of cases. In this situation it is not unusual for them to have a few complaints listed with us. Always look at the decision we make, not just the number of complaints.

  • What type of work do they do? 

We know that some legal work, such as personal injury, litigation and criminal work, can be more complex for people to understand and the outcomes might not be what people want. This means that complaints could be more likely, but always check what the outcome of the complaint was first.



Downloading data

If this information is used, for example on comparison sites, we encourage you to signpost to the Legal Ombudsman so consumers have the opportunity to find out more about the complaints data.

 


Please click on the green cross in the table below and this will give you more information about the legal service provider and the total decisions made in the last 12 months.

You will find the green cross in front of the name of the legal service provider.

In the table below, the ‘ombudsman remedy required’ field will be 0 if:

  • the ombudsman did not propose a remedy or

  • the remedy proposed by the ombudsman was equal to, or less than, the remedy offered by the firm before we investigated the complaint.

Where data says N/A, this means the ombudsman found the provider’s service to be reasonable.

Filter results by area of law

Number of firms: 642

Number of decisions: 887

Name Number Of Decisions Ombudsman Remedy Required
J W HUGHES & CO LLP 1 1
JACKLYN DAWSON 1 0
JACOBS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
James & Co Solicitors LLP 1 1
Janes Solicitors LLP 1 1
Jarmans Solicitors (JS) Limited 6 5
Jason Elliott Associates Limited 1 0
JENNINGS SOLICITORS 1 1
JF LAW LIMITED 1 1
JMR SOLICITORS LTD 1 1
JMW SOLICITORS LLP 7 1
JOHN W DAVIES LEGAL LIMITED 1 1
JOHNS GILBERT & FRANKTON LLP 2 1
JOHNSON AND BOON LIMITED 1 1
JONES MYERS LTD 1 1
JONES SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
Jones Whyte LLP 1 1
Joseph Chiffers Barrister at Law Limited 1 0
JOSS LEGAL SOLUTIONS LIMITED 1 1
JS Law Limited 1 0
JUDGE & PRIESTLEY LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP 1 0
Julie West Solicitors Limited 2 2
KALSI SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
KENNEDYS LAW LLP 1 0
KEOGHS LLP 1 1
KESAR & CO LTD 1 1
Keystone Law Limited 1 1
KIDD RAPINET LLP 1 1
Kilvington Solicitors Limited 1 0
Kings Court Trust Ltd 3 1
KINGSFORDS SOLICITORS LIMITED 2 1
KIRWANS 1 1
KLEYMAN & CO SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
KLR SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
KNAPMAN & CO 1 1
Knights Professional Services Limited 4 0
KNIGHTS SOLICITORS 2 2
LAMBERT PUGH LLP 1 1
Lansdowne Law Limited 1 1
LARGE & GIBSON 1 0
LATIMER LEE SOLICITORS LIMITED 2 2
Latimer Legal Solicitors Limited 2 2
LAW LANE SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
Law Together LLP 1 1
LAWBRIEFS LIMITED 1 1
LAWCOMMERCIAL TRADING LIMITED 3 3
LAWDIT SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
LAWMATIC SOLICITORS 1 0
LAWTEC SOLICITORS 2 2
LAYTONS LLP 1 1
Leading Property Lawyers Limited 1 0
LEE & COMPANY 1 1
Legal IM Limited 1 1
LEGAL JUSTICE SOLICITORS LTD 1 1
LEGAL NATIONAL LIMITED 3 3
LEIGH DAY 1 0
LESTER DOMINIC SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
LIVERPOOL LEGAL SERVICES LTD 1 0
LMP LAW LIMITED 1 1
LONDON CORPORATE LEGAL LIMITED 1 0
LONGMORES SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
LOUND MULRENAN JEFFERIES SOLICITORS 1 1
LPC LAW LTD 1 1
LUX LAW LIMITED 1 0
LYONS DAVIDSON LIMITED 3 2
LYSANDER LAW LIMITED 1 1
M8 Trading LTD 1 0
MACS LEGAL SERVICES LTD 1 1
MADDOX LEGAL LIMITED 1 1
MAJ LAW LIMITED 2 0
MAJORLAW LIMITED 1 1
MAKWANA SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
Mancini Legal Limited 3 3
MANDER CRUICKSHANK SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
MANDY PETERS SOLICITORS 1 1
MANLEYS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
MARIEL IRVINE 1 0
MARK ABBOTT SOLICITORS 4 4
MARK SWATTS MORSE LLP 1 1
Market Street Law Limited 1 1
Marshall Hall Levy Limited 1 1
MAWDSLEYS 1 1
MAXWELL HODGE LIMITED 1 1
MCHALE LEGAL LIMITED 1 0
MCKEAG & CO SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
MCKENZIE LAW LIMITED 1 0
MEIKLES SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
MELLOR SOLICITORS LIMITED 4 4
MENZIES LAW LIMITED 1 0
Merali Beedle Limited 1 1
MERIDIAN PRIVATE CLIENT LLP 1 1
MFG SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
MICHELMORES LLP 1 0
MIDDLESEX LAW CHAMBERS 1 1
MILLER ROSENFALCK LLP 2 0
MILLS & REEVE LLP 1 0
MINSTER LAW LIMITED 6 3
Miss Archna Dawar 1 0
Miss Catherine Eileen Hewitt of Quartz Barristers Chambers 1 0
Miss Hannah Rose Gomersall of Coram Chambers 1 0

If you cannot see any information relating to a decision you have selected above, the ombudsman decided that no remedy was required in the case