Ombudsman decision data

We publish data about the final decisions made by our ombudsmen.

Our Policy Statement sets out why we publish this information.

This data is updated on a rolling quarterly basis and most of our decisions will be published in the quarter after the decision was made.

Each decision remains published for 12 months from the date of publication.

Included in the table below are details of the ombudsman decisions made between 1 July 2025 – 30 June 2026.

The CSV file for this information can be found here.

How to use this information


General information

The information in the table below shows:

  • Name of the service provider.
  • Total decisions about the service provider in the last 12 months.

Click on the name to find the details of each complaint.



Choosing a service provider

This information can be used to look at the record of service providers. When you look at the information it's useful to ask:

  • Does a complaint mean the firm provides poor service?

No. It's important to check the data and see if we decided whether the service was reasonable or not.

Also take into account that everyone makes mistakes from time to time. When this happens it is important how the service provider responds to the complaint. The data will also show you whether we thought their own (first-tier) complaints handling process was reasonable or not. You should be able to find information about their complaints process on their website.

  • How big is the provider?

If a provider has more than one complaint with us, it could be because they are a big provider and deal with thousands of cases. In this situation it is not unusual for them to have a few complaints listed with us. Always look at the decision we make, not just the number of complaints.

  • What type of work do they do? 

We know that some legal work, such as personal injury, litigation and criminal work, can be more complex for people to understand and the outcomes might not be what people want. This means that complaints could be more likely, but always check what the outcome of the complaint was first.



Downloading data

If this information is used, for example on comparison sites, we encourage you to signpost to the Legal Ombudsman so consumers have the opportunity to find out more about the complaints data.

 


Please click on the green cross in the table below and this will give you more information about the legal service provider and the total decisions made in the last 12 months.

You will find the green cross in front of the name of the legal service provider.

In the table below, the ‘ombudsman remedy required’ field will be 0 if:

  • the ombudsman did not propose a remedy or

  • the remedy proposed by the ombudsman was equal to, or less than, the remedy offered by the firm before we investigated the complaint.

Where data says N/A, this means the ombudsman found the provider’s service to be reasonable.

Filter results by area of law

Number of firms: 642

Number of decisions: 887

Name Number Of Decisions Ombudsman Remedy Required
Mr Simon William Edward Charles of St Johns Buildings 1 0
Mr Simon Howard Brilliant of Lamb Chambers 1 0
Mr Simon David Burch of St Ive's Chambers 1 1
Mr Sarbjit Singh Boora of Cornwall Street Barristers 1 0
Mr Samuel Nwabueze Okoronkwo of Mercantile Chambers 2 1
Mr Sami Ur Rahman 1 1
Mr Omar Sherif Ensaff of No5 Chambers 1 0
Mr Michael Stephen Cane-Soothill of Bank House Chambers 1 0
Mr Michael David Collard of 5 Pump Court 1 0
Mr Martin Mintah Mensah of Nine Chambers 1 1
Mr Marcus James Croskell 1 1
Mr Liam Michael Ryan of 7BR 1 0
Mr Kwabena Owusu of Flat 1 2 2
Mr Joseph John Bela Leslie Giret of 1EC Barristers 1 0
Mr John Patrick King of 9 Bedford Row 1 0
Mr Ian Anthony Stebbings of Deka Chambers 1 0
Mr Haresh Sood of Haresh Sood Law Chambers 1 0
Mr Graeme Wood 1 1
Mr Dingle Clark of Goldsmith Chambers 1 1
Mr Christopher Stephen Moss of St Johns Buildings 1 0
Mr Christopher Bryan Jeyes of Drystone Chambers 1 0
Mr Charles Daniel Harman of 15 Winckley Square 1 0
Mr Carl David Fender of Bank House Chambers 1 0
Mr Balahl Khan of The Barrister Group (Taunton) 1 0
Mr Asim Hussain of The Barrister Group (Manchester) 1 1
Mr Adrian Henry Peck of 12CP 1 0
Mr Adam John Dutton Budworth of 2 Bedford Row 1 0
MOSS BEACHLEY MULLEM AND COLEMAN LIMITED 1 1
Morr & Co LLP 1 1
MORGAN WISEMAN SOLICITORS LTD 1 1
MORECROFTS LLP 1 0
MOORE BARLOW LLP 1 0
Montrose Conveyancing Ltd 1 1
MLL Limited 3 2
MKB SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
MJP CONVEYANCING LIMITED 1 0
MIYA Limited 2 0
MITCHELLS 1 0
Miss Sarah Tiffany Munro of St Mary's Family Law Chambers 1 0
Miss Samantha Kane of Holland Park Chambers 1 0
Miss Sally Harrison of St Johns Buildings 1 0
Miss Hermione Rose Williams of New Square Chambers 1 1
Miss Hannah Rose Gomersall of Coram Chambers 1 0
Miss Catherine Eileen Hewitt of Quartz Barristers Chambers 1 0
Miss Archna Dawar 1 0
MINSTER LAW LIMITED 6 3
MILLS & REEVE LLP 1 0
MILLER ROSENFALCK LLP 2 0
MIDDLESEX LAW CHAMBERS 1 1
MICHELMORES LLP 1 0
MFG SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
MERIDIAN PRIVATE CLIENT LLP 1 1
Merali Beedle Limited 1 1
MENZIES LAW LIMITED 1 0
MELLOR SOLICITORS LIMITED 4 4
MEIKLES SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
MCKENZIE LAW LIMITED 1 0
MCKEAG & CO SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
MCHALE LEGAL LIMITED 1 0
MAXWELL HODGE LIMITED 1 1
MAWDSLEYS 1 1
Marshall Hall Levy Limited 1 1
Market Street Law Limited 1 1
MARK SWATTS MORSE LLP 1 1
MARK ABBOTT SOLICITORS 4 4
MARIEL IRVINE 1 0
MANLEYS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
MANDY PETERS SOLICITORS 1 1
MANDER CRUICKSHANK SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
Mancini Legal Limited 3 3
MAKWANA SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
MAJORLAW LIMITED 1 1
MAJ LAW LIMITED 2 0
MADDOX LEGAL LIMITED 1 1
MACS LEGAL SERVICES LTD 1 1
M8 Trading LTD 1 0
LYSANDER LAW LIMITED 1 1
LYONS DAVIDSON LIMITED 3 2
LUX LAW LIMITED 1 0
LPC LAW LTD 1 1
LOUND MULRENAN JEFFERIES SOLICITORS 1 1
LONGMORES SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
LONDON CORPORATE LEGAL LIMITED 1 0
LMP LAW LIMITED 1 1
LIVERPOOL LEGAL SERVICES LTD 1 0
LESTER DOMINIC SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
LEIGH DAY 1 0
LEGAL NATIONAL LIMITED 3 3
LEGAL JUSTICE SOLICITORS LTD 1 1
Legal IM Limited 1 1
LEE & COMPANY 1 1
Leading Property Lawyers Limited 1 0
LAYTONS LLP 1 1
LAWTEC SOLICITORS 2 2
LAWMATIC SOLICITORS 1 0
LAWDIT SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
LAWCOMMERCIAL TRADING LIMITED 3 3
LAWBRIEFS LIMITED 1 1
Law Together LLP 1 1
LAW LANE SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1

If you cannot see any information relating to a decision you have selected above, the ombudsman decided that no remedy was required in the case