Ombudsman decision data

We publish data about the final decisions made by our ombudsmen.

Our Policy Statement sets out why we publish this information.

This data is updated on a rolling quarterly basis and most of our decisions will be published in the quarter after the decision was made.

Each decision remains published for 12 months from the date of publication.

Included in the table below are details of the ombudsman decisions made between 1 July 2025 – 30 June 2026.

The CSV file for this information can be found here.

How to use this information


General information

The information in the table below shows:

  • Name of the service provider.
  • Total decisions about the service provider in the last 12 months.

Click on the name to find the details of each complaint.



Choosing a service provider

This information can be used to look at the record of service providers. When you look at the information it's useful to ask:

  • Does a complaint mean the firm provides poor service?

No. It's important to check the data and see if we decided whether the service was reasonable or not.

Also take into account that everyone makes mistakes from time to time. When this happens it is important how the service provider responds to the complaint. The data will also show you whether we thought their own (first-tier) complaints handling process was reasonable or not. You should be able to find information about their complaints process on their website.

  • How big is the provider?

If a provider has more than one complaint with us, it could be because they are a big provider and deal with thousands of cases. In this situation it is not unusual for them to have a few complaints listed with us. Always look at the decision we make, not just the number of complaints.

  • What type of work do they do? 

We know that some legal work, such as personal injury, litigation and criminal work, can be more complex for people to understand and the outcomes might not be what people want. This means that complaints could be more likely, but always check what the outcome of the complaint was first.



Downloading data

If this information is used, for example on comparison sites, we encourage you to signpost to the Legal Ombudsman so consumers have the opportunity to find out more about the complaints data.

 


Please click on the green cross in the table below and this will give you more information about the legal service provider and the total decisions made in the last 12 months.

You will find the green cross in front of the name of the legal service provider.

In the table below, the ‘ombudsman remedy required’ field will be 0 if:

  • the ombudsman did not propose a remedy or

  • the remedy proposed by the ombudsman was equal to, or less than, the remedy offered by the firm before we investigated the complaint.

Where data says N/A, this means the ombudsman found the provider’s service to be reasonable.

Filter results by area of law

Number of firms: 642

Number of decisions: 887

Name Number Of Decisions Ombudsman Remedy Required
YVA SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
XYZ LAW LTD 1 1
WYM Legal Limited 1 1
WSP SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
WRIGLEYS SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
WOSSKOW BROWN SOLICITORS LLP 2 2
WOOLLEY & CO LIMITED 1 0
WOOLLCOMBE YONGE LLP 1 0
Woodstock Legal Services Limited 1 1
Wood, Alex 1 0
WOLLEN MICHELMORE LLP 2 1
WLS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
WINN SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
WILLIAMS & CO 1 1
WILKIN CHAPMAN LLP 3 1
WestParc Law Limited 1 0
WATSON RAMSBOTTOM LIMITED 1 1
WATERSTONE CHAMBERS LLP 1 0
WARNERS LAW LLP 1 0
WARNER GOODMAN LLP 1 0
WARINGS SOLICITORS LTD 1 1
WARD GETHIN ARCHER LIMITED 1 0
WARD & RIDER LTD 1 1
WANSBROUGHS LLP 1 1
WALTERS & BARBARY LLP 1 1
WALLACE LLP 1 0
Walker Wise Limited 1 1
WALKER FOSTER LIMITED 1 1
W A G Davidson & Co 3 3
VIRGO CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD 3 3
VH Law Limited 1 0
VANDERPUMP & SYKES LLP 2 0
VAN EATON SOLICITORS 1 0
Valentine Duggins Limited 1 0
V. E. WHITE & CO. LTD 1 0
UMBRELLA LEGAL LIMITED 1 0
TV EDWARDS LLP 1 1
TUCKERS SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
TREADSTONE LAW LIMITED 1 0
TRADE UNION LEGAL LLP 1 1
TOLLERS LLP 1 1
TINKLER SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
THURSFIELDS LEGAL LIMITED 1 0
THRINGS LLP 1 0
THRING TOWNSEND LEE & PEMBERTONS 1 1
THOMSON WEBB & CORFIELD LLP 1 0
THOMSON SNELL & PASSMORE LLP 1 0
THE WILKES PARTNERSHIP LLP 1 0
THE OWEN KENNY PARTNERSHIP LIMITED 1 1
THE J M PRACTICE LIMITED 1 1
THE D M PARTNERSHIP 1 0
Terri Brookes 1 1
TEDSTONE GEORGE & TEDSTONE 1 1
Taylor Rose Limited 4 2
TAYLOR ROSE LAW LLP 1 1
TAYLOR & EMMET LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP 1 0
TALBOTS LAW LTD 3 2
TALBOT WALKER LLP 1 0
TAJ SOLICITORS LTD 1 1
TAJ MUGHAL LIMITED 1 0
SYEDS LAWCARE SOLICITORS 1 1
SYDNEY MITCHELL LLP 2 0
SWITALSKIS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
SWIFT LAWYERS LIMITED 1 0
SUTTONS 1 1
SUMMERFIELD BROWNE LIMITED 1 0
Stryders Solicitors Limited 1 1
STREATHERS SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
STREATHERS HIGHGATE LLP 1 0
STOWE FAMILY LAW LLP 4 1
STOCKER & CO LLP 1 1
STEVE DAVIES SOLICITORS LTD 5 5
Sternberg Reed LLP 1 1
Sterling Partners Limited 1 1
STERLING LAWYERS LTD 2 1
STEPHENSONS SOLICITORS LLP 2 0
STEPHENS WILMOT LTD 1 0
STEPHENS SCOWN LLP 1 0
STEPHEN RIMMER LLP 1 1
STEPHEN FIDLER & CO 2 2
STEPHEN BURDON SOLICITORS 1 1
STALWART SOLICITORS 1 1
ST ANDREW TRUSTEES LIMITED 1 0
SSB Group Limited 10 8
SPRING AND CO SOLICITORS LTD 1 0
SPICKETTS BATTRICK LAW PRACTICE 1 1
SPENCERS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
SPENCER WEST LLP 1 1
SPECTARE LIMITED 1 1
SOMERFIELD & CO LIMITED 1 0
SOLUTION LAW LIMITED T/A DALE LANGLEY SOLICITORS 1 1
SOLOMON SOLICITORS 1 0
SO LEGAL LIMITED 2 2
SMQ LEGAL SERVICES LLP 1 1
SMITHS (SOLICITORS) LLP 1 1
SMITH & CO SOLICITORS 1 0
Slater Heelis Limited 2 1
Slater and Gordon UK Limited 2 1
SKYLARK HILL SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
SK LLOYDS SOLICITORS LTD 1 1

If you cannot see any information relating to a decision you have selected above, the ombudsman decided that no remedy was required in the case