Ombudsman decision data

We publish data about the final decisions made by ombudsman.

Our Policy Statement sets out why we publish this information.

This data is updated on a rolling quarterly basis and most of our decisions will be published in the quarter after the decision was made.

Each decision remains published for 12 months from the date of publication.

Included in the table below are details of the ombudsman decisions made between 1 July 2024 – 30 June 2025.

The CSV file for this information can be found here.

How to use this information


General information

The information in the table below shows:

  • Name of the service provider.
  • Total decisions about the service provider in the last 12 months.

Click on the name to find the details of each complaint.



Choosing a service provider

This information can be used to look at the record of service providers. When you look at the information it's useful to ask:

  • Does a complaint mean the firm provides poor service?

No. It's important to check the data and see if we decided whether the service was reasonable or not.

Also take into account that everyone makes mistakes from time to time. When this happens it is important how the service provider responds to the complaint. The data will also show you whether we thought their own (first-tier) complaints handling process was reasonable or not. You should be able to find information about their complaints process on their website.

  • How big is the provider?

If a provider has more than one complaint with us, it could be because they are a big provider and deal with thousands of cases. In this situation it is not unusual for them to have a few complaints listed with us. Always look at the decision we make, not just the number of complaints.

  • What type of work do they do? 

We know that some legal work, such as personal injury, litigation and criminal work, can be more complex for people to understand and the outcomes might not be what people want. This means that complaints could be more likely, but always check what the outcome of the complaint was first.



Downloading data

If this information is used, for example on comparison sites, we encourage you to signpost to the Legal Ombudsman so consumers have the opportunity to find out more about the complaints data.

 


Please click on the green cross in the table below and this will give you more information about the legal service provider and the total decisions made in the last 12 months.

You will find the green cross in front of the name of the legal service provider.

In the table below, the ‘ombudsman remedy required’ field will be 0 if:

  • the ombudsman did not propose a remedy or

  • the remedy proposed by the ombudsman was equal to, or less than, the remedy offered by the firm before we investigated the complaint.

Where data says N/A, this means the ombudsman found the provider’s service to be reasonable.

Filter results by area of law

Number of firms: 792

Number of decisions: 1125

Name Number Of Decisions Ombudsman Remedy Required
A WILLIAMS & CO 1 0
A.G. LUCAS AND CO 1 1
ABBEY SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
Abbott Legal Limited 1 0
ABENSONS LAW LIMITED 1 1
ABRAHAM BARON SOLICITORS LTD 1 1
AC GILEAD SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
Ackroyd Legal (London) LLP 10 10
Ackroyd Legal Limited 1 1
ADAMS HARRISON 1 1
ADDISON & KHAN SOLICITORS LONDON LIMITED 1 1
ADMIRAL LAW LIMITED 2 2
AFG LAW LIMITED 1 0
AFP Bloom LLP 1 0
AGEAS LAW LLP 3 1
Alexander Grace Law Limited 1 1
Allerton & Gladstone Ltd 1 1
ALM LAW LIMITED 1 1
Alpha Law Solicitors 1 0
ALPS LEGAL PRACTICE LIMITED 1 0
ALSTERS KELLEY SOLICITORS LTD 1 0
AMAN SOLICITORS ADVOCATES (LONDON) LTD 1 1
Andre Rohan Taylor-Morris 1 1
ANGELUS LAW LTD 1 0
ANSHAM WHITE LIMITED 1 1
ANTHONY & JARVIE 1 1
APEX ABS LIMITED 1 1
Apple Tree Family Law Ltd 1 0
APPLEBYS SOLICITORS LTD 2 1
ARAG LAW LIMITED 2 1
ARCADIAN LAW LIMITED 1 1
ARCHWAYS MANCHESTER LTD 1 1
Aristone Limited 1 1
Arrow Conveyancing Limited 1 1
ASHFORDS LLP 4 1
ASHLEY TAYLORS LEGAL LIMITED 1 0
ASHLEY WILSON SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
Ashtons Legal 1 1
Ashtons Legal LLP 1 0
ASHTONS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
ASTON GOWMAN LIMITED 1 1
ASTUTE DYNAMIC LTD 1 1
ATKINS HOPE SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
ATM LAW 1 1
AUSTIN KEMP SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
AVERY & WALTERS LIMITED 1 1
AVERY KNIGHTS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
AWH LEGAL LTD 1 0
Axiom Ince Limited 6 4
Bailey & Co 1 1
BANKSIDE COMMERCIAL LIMITED 1 1
BARCAN+KIRBY LLP 1 1
BARKER BOOTH & EASTWOOD LIMITED 1 0
Barker Gotelee LLP 1 1
BARRETT & CO SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
BARROW AND COOK SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
BATTENS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
BEACON WEALTH LEGAL LTD 2 2
BEAUMONT ABS LTD 10 9
BEAUMONT LEGAL 2 1
BEETON EDWARDS LLP 1 1
BEIGHTON SINGH LIMITED 1 1
BELL & BUXTON LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP 1 1
BEN HOARE BELL LLP 1 0
BENDLES LLP 2 0
Benjamin David Tisdall 1 1
BERENSENS LLP 1 1
BERRY & LAMBERTS LLP 1 1
BERRY SMITH LLP 3 0
BES LEGAL LIMITED 3 3
Bespoke Law Services (UK) Limited 1 1
BG SOLICITORS LLP 2 2
BHATIA BEST LIMITED 2 0
BINAS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
BIRKETTS LLP 2 1
BISCOES LEGAL SERVICES LIMITED 1 1
BLACK NORMAN SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
BLACKSTONE SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
BLAKEWATER SOLICITORS LTD 1 1
BLAKEWELLS SOLICITORS LIMITED 2 1
BLANCHARDS BAILEY LLP 2 0
Blanchards Law Ltd 2 1
BLASER MILLS LLP 1 0
BMC LAW LTD 1 1
BONALLACK & BISHOP 1 1
BOND ADAMS LLP 1 0
BONNINGTONS SOLICITORS 1 1
BOWER & BAILEY LLP 1 1
Bower Cotton Hamilton LLP 1 1
Boys and Maughan LLP 1 0
BPL SOLICITORS LIMITED 3 3
BRAITCH SOLICITORS 1 1
BRETHERTON LAW LTD 1 0
BRETHERTONS LLP 1 0
BRIDGE MCFARLAND LLP 1 0
BRIDGER & CO LIMITED 2 2
BRINDLEY TWIST TAFFT & JAMES LLP 1 1
BROMETS JACKSON HEATH LLP 1 1
BROMLEYS SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
BROWN TURNER ROSS LIMITED 1 1

If you cannot see any information relating to a decision you have selected above, the ombudsman decided that no remedy was required in the case