Ombudsman decision data

We publish data about the final decisions made by our ombudsmen.

Our Policy Statement sets out why we publish this information.

This data is updated on a rolling quarterly basis and most of our decisions will be published in the quarter after the decision was made.

Each decision remains published for 12 months from the date of publication.

Included in the table below are details of the ombudsman decisions made between 1 July 2025 – 30 June 2026.

The CSV file for this information can be found here.

How to use this information


General information

The information in the table below shows:

  • Name of the service provider.
  • Total decisions about the service provider in the last 12 months.

Click on the name to find the details of each complaint.



Choosing a service provider

This information can be used to look at the record of service providers. When you look at the information it's useful to ask:

  • Does a complaint mean the firm provides poor service?

No. It's important to check the data and see if we decided whether the service was reasonable or not.

Also take into account that everyone makes mistakes from time to time. When this happens it is important how the service provider responds to the complaint. The data will also show you whether we thought their own (first-tier) complaints handling process was reasonable or not. You should be able to find information about their complaints process on their website.

  • How big is the provider?

If a provider has more than one complaint with us, it could be because they are a big provider and deal with thousands of cases. In this situation it is not unusual for them to have a few complaints listed with us. Always look at the decision we make, not just the number of complaints.

  • What type of work do they do? 

We know that some legal work, such as personal injury, litigation and criminal work, can be more complex for people to understand and the outcomes might not be what people want. This means that complaints could be more likely, but always check what the outcome of the complaint was first.



Downloading data

If this information is used, for example on comparison sites, we encourage you to signpost to the Legal Ombudsman so consumers have the opportunity to find out more about the complaints data.

 


Please click on the green cross in the table below and this will give you more information about the legal service provider and the total decisions made in the last 12 months.

You will find the green cross in front of the name of the legal service provider.

In the table below, the ‘ombudsman remedy required’ field will be 0 if:

  • the ombudsman did not propose a remedy or

  • the remedy proposed by the ombudsman was equal to, or less than, the remedy offered by the firm before we investigated the complaint.

Where data says N/A, this means the ombudsman found the provider’s service to be reasonable.

Filter results by area of law

Number of firms: 642

Number of decisions: 887

Name Number Of Decisions Ombudsman Remedy Required
360 LAW SERVICES LIMITED 1 1
A-Z LAW SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
A.P. BERKELEY LTD 1 1
Abbott Legal Limited 3 3
ABBOTT SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
ABENSONS LAW LIMITED 1 1
ABV SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
ACCIDENT INJURY SOLICITORS LTD 1 1
Ackroyd Legal (London) LLP 3 3
ADLAMS LLP 1 1
ADMIRAL LAW LIMITED 3 3
AFFINITY SEVEN LAW SOLICITORS LTD 1 1
AFG LAW LIMITED 1 1
AI LAW GROUP LIMITED 1 1
Alan Kerr 1 1
Aletta Shaw Ltd 1 0
ALEXANDER & PARTNERS 1 1
ALISON LAW SOLICITORS LLP 12 11
Allchurch Property Lawyers Limited 2 2
ALLENS CADGE & GILBERT LTD 1 0
ALMY & THOMAS LIMITED 1 1
ALS (MCR) LTD 1 1
ALSTERS KELLEY SOLICITORS LTD 1 1
ALUN JONES FAMILY LAW LIMITED 1 0
AMICUS LAW (SOUTH WEST) LLP 1 1
ANDREW ISAACS LAW LIMITED 1 1
ANTHONY COLLINS SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
ANTONY HODARI HOLDINGS LIMITED 1 0
ANVONER LAW LTD 1 0
APPLEBY HOPE & MATTHEWS 1 0
ARAG LAW LIMITED 1 0
Arch Law Limited 1 0
ARCHBOLD SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
ARCHSTONE SOLICITORS LTD 1 1
Arrow Conveyancing Limited 2 2
ASHLEY TAYLORS LEGAL LIMITED 1 0
ASTUTE DYNAMIC LTD 1 1
ASTWOOD LAW LIMITED 1 0
ATHENA SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
ATICUS LAW LTD 2 2
AUSTIN KEMP SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
Awdry Law LLP 1 0
Axiom Ince Limited 6 4
AZAM & CO SOLICITORS 1 0
B P COLLINS LLP 2 1
BAILEYS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
BAKER ASHLEY LIMITED 1 1
BAND HATTON BUTTON LLP 1 1
BANK SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
BANNER JONES LIMITED 1 0
BARBER SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
BARKER SON & ISHERWOOD LLP 1 1
BARNES AND PARTNERS 2 1
BATT BROADBENT SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
BEARDSELLS LIMITED 1 1
BEAUMONT ABS LTD 2 2
Benjamin David Tisdall 1 1
BENNETT WELCH LLP 1 1
BEOR WILSON LLOYD SOLICITORS 1 0
BERRY & LAMBERTS LLP 1 1
BERRY REDMOND GORDON AND PENNEY LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP 1 0
BES LEGAL LIMITED 3 3
Bespoke Law Services (UK) Limited 2 2
Best Solicitors Limited 3 3
BEVAN-EVANS & CAPEHORN SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
Bhatti & BhattBhatt Solicitors Ltd 1 1
BIRKETT LONG LLP 1 1
BIRKETTS LLP 1 1
BISHOPSGATE LAW LTD 2 1
BLACK STONE SOLICITORS 1 1
BLACKETT HART & PRATT LLP 1 1
BLACKHURST BUDD LIMITED 1 1
BLANDY & BLANDY LLP 1 1
BMA Law Limited 1 1
BONALLACK & BISHOP 1 1
BOND TURNER LIMITED 1 1
BOULTER AND CO LLP 1 1
Bower Cotton Hamilton LLP 1 1
BOYCE HATTON LLP 1 1
BPL SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
BPS LAW LLP 1 0
BRACHERS LLP 1 1
BRETHERTON LAW LTD 1 0
BRETHERTONS LLP 2 0
BRETT WILSON LLP 1 0
BRIAN HARRIS & CO 1 1
BRIDGER & CO LIMITED 1 1
BRIEFS LAW LIMITED 1 1
BRIGHOUSES (INCORPORATING BELLIS KENNAN GRIBBLE & CO) 2 1
BRIGHT (SOUTH WEST) LLP 1 1
Bright Legal Solicitors Limited 1 0
BRITTONS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
Broadfield Law UK LLP 2 2
BROCKBANK CURWEN CAIN AND HALL LIMITED 1 0
BROMETS JACKSON HEATH LLP 2 2
BROOKLYN LAW LIMITED 1 1
BROSS BENNETT LLP 1 0
BUCKLES SOLICITORS LLP 3 2
BURNETT BARKER SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
Burton Copeland (Manchester) Limited 1 0

If you cannot see any information relating to a decision you have selected above, the ombudsman decided that no remedy was required in the case