Ombudsman decision data

We publish data about the final decisions made by ombudsman.

Our Policy Statement sets out why we publish this information.

This data is updated on a rolling quarterly basis and most of our decisions will be published in the quarter after the decision was made.

Each decision remains published for 12 months from the date of publication.

Included in the table below are details of the ombudsman decisions made between 1 April 2024 – 31 March 2025.

The CSV file for this information can be found here.

How to use this information


General information

The information in the table below shows:

  • Name of the service provider.
  • Total decisions about the service provider in the last 12 months.

Click on the name to find the details of each complaint.



Choosing a service provider

This information can be used to look at the record of service providers. When you look at the information it's useful to ask:

  • Does a complaint mean the firm provides poor service?

No. It's important to check the data and see if we decided whether the service was reasonable or not.

Also take into account that everyone makes mistakes from time to time. When this happens it is important how the service provider responds to the complaint. The data will also show you whether we thought their own (first-tier) complaints handling process was reasonable or not. You should be able to find information about their complaints process on their website.

  • How big is the provider?

If a provider has more than one complaint with us, it could be because they are a big provider and deal with thousands of cases. In this situation it is not unusual for them to have a few complaints listed with us. Always look at the decision we make, not just the number of complaints.

  • What type of work do they do? 

We know that some legal work, such as personal injury, litigation and criminal work, can be more complex for people to understand and the outcomes might not be what people want. This means that complaints could be more likely, but always check what the outcome of the complaint was first.



Downloading data

If this information is used, for example on comparison sites, we encourage you to signpost to the Legal Ombudsman so consumers have the opportunity to find out more about the complaints data.

 


Please click on the green cross in the table below and this will give you more information about the legal service provider and the total decisions made in the last 12 months.

You will find the green cross in front of the name of the legal service provider.

In the table below, the ‘ombudsman remedy required’ field will be 0 if:

  • the ombudsman did not propose a remedy or

  • the remedy proposed by the ombudsman was equal to, or less than, the remedy offered by the firm before we investigated the complaint.

Where data says N/A, this means the ombudsman found the provider’s service to be reasonable.

Filter results by area of law

Number of firms: 843

Number of decisions: 1226

Name Number Of Decisions Ombudsman Remedy Required
A & T LEGAL LTD 1 1
A WILLIAMS & CO 1 0
A.G. LUCAS AND CO 1 1
Abbott Legal Limited 1 0
ABBOTT SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
ABERDEIN CONSIDINE & COMPANY 1 1
ABRAHAM BARON SOLICITORS LTD 1 1
AC GILEAD SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
ACCIDENT INJURY SOLICITORS LTD 1 0
Ackroyd Legal (London) LLP 14 14
Ackroyd Legal Limited 1 1
ADAMS HARRISON 1 1
ADDISON & KHAN SOLICITORS LONDON LIMITED 1 1
ADMIRAL LAW LIMITED 2 2
AEQUITAS LEGAL SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
AFG LAW LIMITED 1 0
AFP Bloom LLP 1 0
AGEAS LAW LLP 2 1
Alexander Grace Law Limited 3 3
ALISON LAW SOLICITORS LLP 4 3
Allerton & Gladstone Ltd 1 1
Alpha Law Solicitors 1 0
ALPS LEGAL PRACTICE LIMITED 1 0
ALSTERS KELLEY SOLICITORS LTD 1 0
AMAN SOLICITORS ADVOCATES (LONDON) LTD 1 1
Andre Rohan Taylor-Morris 1 1
ANGELUS LAW LTD 1 0
ANSAR LONDON LIMITED 1 0
ANSHAM WHITE LIMITED 1 1
ANTHONY & JARVIE 1 1
APEX ABS LIMITED 1 1
Apple Tree Family Law Ltd 1 0
APPLEBYS SOLICITORS LTD 2 1
ARCADIAN LAW LIMITED 1 1
ARCHWAYS MANCHESTER LTD 1 1
Aristone Limited 1 1
ARMSTRONG & CO 1 0
ASHFORDS LLP 5 3
ASHLEY TAYLORS LEGAL LIMITED 1 0
ASHLEY WILSON SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
Ashtons Legal 1 1
Ashtons Legal LLP 1 0
ASTON GOWMAN LIMITED 1 1
ATKINS HOPE SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
ATM LAW 1 1
Atray Ltd 1 1
AUSTIN KEMP SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
AVENTUS LAW LIMITED 2 2
AVERY & WALTERS LIMITED 1 1
AVERY KNIGHTS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
AWH LEGAL LTD 1 0
Axiom Ince Limited 4 2
BAKERLAW LLP 1 1
BANKSIDE COMMERCIAL LIMITED 1 1
BANNER JONES LIMITED 1 1
BARCAN+KIRBY LLP 2 2
BARRETT & CO SOLICITORS LLP 2 0
BARROW AND COOK SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
BATTENS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
BDB Pitmans LLP 1 1
BEACON WEALTH LEGAL LTD 2 2
BEAUMONT ABS LTD 15 13
BEAUMONT LEGAL 3 2
BEETON EDWARDS LLP 1 1
BEIGHTON SINGH LIMITED 1 1
BELL LAMB & JOYNSON 1 1
BEN HOARE BELL LLP 1 0
BENDLES LLP 2 0
Benjamin David Tisdall 1 1
BERENSENS LLP 1 1
BERRY & LAMBERTS LLP 1 1
BERRY SMITH LLP 1 0
BES LEGAL LIMITED 3 3
Bespoke Law Services (UK) Limited 1 1
Beyond Conveyancing Limited 1 0
BG SOLICITORS LLP 2 2
Bhogal & Co Solicitors 1 0
BHOGAL PARTNERS 1 0
BIRKETTS LLP 1 1
BISCOES LEGAL SERVICES LIMITED 1 1
BLACKSTONE SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
BLAKEWATER SOLICITORS LTD 1 1
BLANCHARDS BAILEY LLP 2 0
BLASER MILLS LLP 1 0
BLOKH SOLICITORS 1 1
BLUNTS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
BONALLACK & BISHOP 1 1
BOND ADAMS LLP 1 0
BOWER & BAILEY LLP 1 1
Boys and Maughan LLP 1 0
BPL SOLICITORS LIMITED 3 3
BPW SOLICITORS LTD 1 0
BRABNERS LLP 2 0
Branch Austin McCormick LLP 1 0
BRAR & CO LTD 1 1
BRETHERTON LAW LTD 1 0
BRETHERTONS LLP 1 0
BRIDGE MCFARLAND LLP 1 0
BRIDGER & CO LIMITED 2 2
BROMETS JACKSON HEATH LLP 1 1

If you cannot see any information relating to a decision you have selected above, the ombudsman decided that no remedy was required in the case