Ombudsman decision data

We publish data about the final decisions made by ombudsman.

Our Policy Statement sets out why we publish this information.

This data is updated on a rolling quarterly basis and most of our decisions will be published in the quarter after the decision was made.

Each decision remains published for 12 months from the date of publication.

Included in the table below are details of the ombudsman decisions made between 1 April 2024 – 31 March 2025.

The CSV file for this information can be found here.

How to use this information


General information

The information in the table below shows:

  • Name of the service provider.
  • Total decisions about the service provider in the last 12 months.

Click on the name to find the details of each complaint.



Choosing a service provider

This information can be used to look at the record of service providers. When you look at the information it's useful to ask:

  • Does a complaint mean the firm provides poor service?

No. It's important to check the data and see if we decided whether the service was reasonable or not.

Also take into account that everyone makes mistakes from time to time. When this happens it is important how the service provider responds to the complaint. The data will also show you whether we thought their own (first-tier) complaints handling process was reasonable or not. You should be able to find information about their complaints process on their website.

  • How big is the provider?

If a provider has more than one complaint with us, it could be because they are a big provider and deal with thousands of cases. In this situation it is not unusual for them to have a few complaints listed with us. Always look at the decision we make, not just the number of complaints.

  • What type of work do they do? 

We know that some legal work, such as personal injury, litigation and criminal work, can be more complex for people to understand and the outcomes might not be what people want. This means that complaints could be more likely, but always check what the outcome of the complaint was first.



Downloading data

If this information is used, for example on comparison sites, we encourage you to signpost to the Legal Ombudsman so consumers have the opportunity to find out more about the complaints data.

 


Please click on the green cross in the table below and this will give you more information about the legal service provider and the total decisions made in the last 12 months.

You will find the green cross in front of the name of the legal service provider.

In the table below, the ‘ombudsman remedy required’ field will be 0 if:

  • the ombudsman did not propose a remedy or

  • the remedy proposed by the ombudsman was equal to, or less than, the remedy offered by the firm before we investigated the complaint.

Where data says N/A, this means the ombudsman found the provider’s service to be reasonable.

Filter results by area of law

Number of firms: 842

Number of decisions: 1224

Name Number Of Decisions Ombudsman Remedy Required
PEACE LEGAL LIMITED 1 1
PEARSON HARDS LLP 1 1
PENMAN SEDGWICK LLP 1 0
PEPPERELLS LTD 1 0
Perduco Law Group LLP 1 0
Perduco Law Ltd 3 3
PERT & MALIM 1 1
PETER LYNN & PARTNERS 2 1
PETER PETER & WRIGHT 2 0
PG LEGAL LIMITED 3 3
PHILIPPOU & CO SOLICITORS 1 1
PHILLIPS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
PICASSO LEGAL LIMITED 1 0
PICTONS SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
PINNEY TALFOURD LIMITED 1 0
PLACIDI LAW COMPANY LIMITED 1 1
PLEASS THOMSON & COMPANY LIMITED 1 1
PM PROPERTY LAWYERS LIMITED 3 3
POOLE ALCOCK LLP 1 1
PORTER DODSON LLP 1 1
POWELL & COMPANY SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
PRAKTICE LEGAL 1 1
Premier Property Lawyers Limited 4 3
PREMIER SOLICITORS (BEDFORD) LIMITED 2 1
PRINCIPIA LAW LIMITED 1 0
Prometheus Law Ltd 3 3
Properts Solicitor Estate Agents Limited 1 0
PROPERTY LEGAL (MANCHESTER) LIMITED 2 1
PUNCH ROBSON 2 2
QC Law Ltd 2 1
QORE LEGAL LTD 1 0
QUALITYSOLICITORS KNIGHT POLSON 1 1
Quanta Law Limited 1 0
QUINN MELVILLE BARROW LLP 1 0
R A W Clark LLP 3 3
RALLI LIMITED 1 0
RAMSDENS SOLICITORS LLP 2 0
RAPHAEL LAW LIMITED 1 0
RASHID & RASHID LAW FIRM 1 1
RAVI SETHI SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
READ ROPER & READ 2 1
Read Roper & Read Solicitors Limited 7 6
REEMANS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
REES WOOD TERRY LIMITED 1 1
REGAL SOLICITORS (NW) LIMITED 1 1
REYNOLDS PARRY JONES LLP 1 0
REYNOLDS PORTER CHAMBERLAIN LLP 1 0
RICHARD MOSS SOLICITORS 1 1
RICHARD NELSON LLP 1 1
Richard Slade & Partners LLP 1 1
RIDLEY AND HALL LEGAL LIMITED 2 0
RIGHT LEGAL GROUP LIMITED 1 1
RIX & KAY SOLICITORS LLP 2 2
RLK SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
RMNJ SOLICITORS 1 0
ROBERT BINGHAM LIMITED 1 1
Robert Mann Solicitors 1 1
Robertsons Legal Limited 1 1
ROBERTSONS LEGAL LIMITED 2 1
Robinson Allfree Solicitors 1 0
ROBYNS OWEN 1 0
ROGER BROOKER & CO 1 0
ROGER RICHARDS SOLICITORS 1 0
ROSE & ROSE SOLICITORS LLP 2 0
ROW & SCOTT LIMITED 1 1
ROWE RADCLIFFE 2 2
ROYDS WITHY KING LLP 1 1
RSA LAW LIMITED 1 0
Rubin Lewis O'Brien LLP 1 0
RUDLINGS SOLICITORS LLP 2 0
RUSSELL - COOKE LLP 1 0
RUSSELL & RUSSELL SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
RUTTERS 1 0
S SATHA & CO LIMITED 1 1
SABZ SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
SAFAAZ SOLICITORS 1 1
SAMUEL PHILLIPS LAW FIRM 1 1
Sanctuary Law Limited 1 1
Sandeep Chandi 1 1
SANDERS WITHERSPOON LLP 2 1
SANDHU & SHAH 1 0
SARA BINNING SOLICITORS 1 1
SARAH WADDINGTON SOLICITORS LTD 2 1
SAUL MARINE & CO SOLICITORS 1 0
SBP LAW 1 0
SCORNIK GERSTEIN LLP 1 1
SCOTT ROWE LIMITED 1 1
SDG SOLICITORS 1 0
SEN LEGAL LIMITED 1 0
Serenity Law LLP 1 1
SETH LAW LIMITED 1 1
SHAFI SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
SHAKESPEARE MARTINEAU LLP 2 0
SHOOSMITHS LLP 1 1
Short Richardson & Forth Solicitors Limited 1 0
SIDNEY TORRANCE & CO 1 1
SILKS SOLICITORS LIMITED 2 2
SILVERDALE SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
SIMON ADAMS SOLICITORS 1 0
Simon Richard thomas 1 1

If you cannot see any information relating to a decision you have selected above, the ombudsman decided that no remedy was required in the case