Ombudsman decision data

We publish data about the final decisions made by ombudsman.

Our Policy Statement sets out why we publish this information.

This data is updated on a rolling quarterly basis and most of our decisions will be published in the quarter after the decision was made.

Each decision remains published for 12 months from the date of publication.

Included in the table below are details of the ombudsman decisions made between 1 October 2024 – 30 September 2025.

The CSV file for this information can be found here.

How to use this information


General information

The information in the table below shows:

  • Name of the service provider.
  • Total decisions about the service provider in the last 12 months.

Click on the name to find the details of each complaint.



Choosing a service provider

This information can be used to look at the record of service providers. When you look at the information it's useful to ask:

  • Does a complaint mean the firm provides poor service?

No. It's important to check the data and see if we decided whether the service was reasonable or not.

Also take into account that everyone makes mistakes from time to time. When this happens it is important how the service provider responds to the complaint. The data will also show you whether we thought their own (first-tier) complaints handling process was reasonable or not. You should be able to find information about their complaints process on their website.

  • How big is the provider?

If a provider has more than one complaint with us, it could be because they are a big provider and deal with thousands of cases. In this situation it is not unusual for them to have a few complaints listed with us. Always look at the decision we make, not just the number of complaints.

  • What type of work do they do? 

We know that some legal work, such as personal injury, litigation and criminal work, can be more complex for people to understand and the outcomes might not be what people want. This means that complaints could be more likely, but always check what the outcome of the complaint was first.



Downloading data

If this information is used, for example on comparison sites, we encourage you to signpost to the Legal Ombudsman so consumers have the opportunity to find out more about the complaints data.

 


Please click on the green cross in the table below and this will give you more information about the legal service provider and the total decisions made in the last 12 months.

You will find the green cross in front of the name of the legal service provider.

In the table below, the ‘ombudsman remedy required’ field will be 0 if:

  • the ombudsman did not propose a remedy or

  • the remedy proposed by the ombudsman was equal to, or less than, the remedy offered by the firm before we investigated the complaint.

Where data says N/A, this means the ombudsman found the provider’s service to be reasonable.

Filter results by area of law

Number of firms: 738

Number of decisions: 1043

Name Number Of Decisions Ombudsman Remedy Required
Keystone Law Limited 1 1
KEW LAW LLP 1 0
KESAR & CO LTD 1 0
KERSEYS SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
KEOGHS NICHOLLS LINDSELL & HARRIS LLP 1 1
KEOGHS LLP 1 1
KENNEDYS LAW LLP 1 1
KELSALL & COMPANY 1 1
KEITH FLOWER & CO 1 0
KEITH DYSON SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
KAYSON SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
JUDGE SYKES FRIXOU LIMITED 1 0
Jones Whyte LLP 1 0
JONES SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
JOHNSONS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
JOHNS GILBERT & FRANKTON LLP 1 0
JOHNS AND SAGGAR LLP 1 1
JOHN W DAVIES LEGAL LIMITED 2 2
JOHN ONIONS SOLICITORS 1 0
JOHN COPLAND & SON 1 1
JMW SOLICITORS LLP 4 2
JMR SOLICITORS LTD 2 2
JEROME & CO SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
JEFFERIES ESSEX LLP 1 0
JEARY & LEWIS LIMITED 1 0
Jason Elliott Associates Limited 1 0
Jarmans Solicitors (JS) Limited 5 5
JAMIESON ALEXANDER LIMITED 1 1
Jacqueline Theresa McKenzie 1 1
JACKSONS COMMERCIAL & PRIVATE LAW LLP 1 1
Jackson Lees Group Ltd 1 0
JACKLYN DAWSON 1 1
J W HUGHES & CO LLP 1 1
ISON HARRISON LIMITED 3 2
IRWIN MITCHELL LLP 10 5
IRVINGS LAW LIMITED 2 2
INFINITY LAW LIMITED 1 1
INCE GORDON DADDS LLP 1 1
IME LAW LIMITED 1 0
IDR LAW LIMITED 1 0
IAN HENERY SOLICITORS LTD 1 1
HUMPHREYS & CO 1 1
HUGH JAMES 2 1
HUGGINS LEWIS FOSKETT 1 0
Hudson & Co 1 0
HS LEGAL SOLICITORS LTD 1 1
HOWELLS LEGAL LIMITED 2 1
HORSEY LIGHTLY 1 1
Hopleys GMA incorporating Keene and Kelly 1 1
HOPKIN MURRAY BESKINE LIMITED 1 0
Hooper Burrowes Legal Limited 1 1
Holden Smith Law Limited 2 2
HODGE HALSALL SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
HODDERS LAW LIMITED 3 2
HKB WILTSHIRES 1 1
High Street Solicitors Ltd 1 1
Hibberts LLP 1 0
HETTS 1 1
HESELWOOD & GRANT SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
HERRINGTON CARMICHAEL LLP 2 1
HERINGTONS LLP 1 1
HENRY HYAMS LIMITED 2 1
HENNESSY & HAMMUDI LIMITED 1 0
Hennah Haywood Law Ltd 2 1
HEK JONES LIMITED 1 1
HEDLEYS & CO 1 1
HEALYS LLP 1 1
HEALD NICKINSON 1 0
HCR Legal LLP 3 1
HCB WIDDOWS MASON LIMITED 1 0
HCB SOLICITORS LTD 3 0
Hayward Moon Limited 1 1
HAY & KILNER LLP 1 0
HAWLEY & RODGERS 1 0
HAWKSLEYS LAW LIMITED 1 1
HAWKRIDGE & COMPANY LLP 1 0
Hawkins Ryan LLP 1 1
HATCHERS SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
HARTNELL CHANOT & PARTNERS LIMITED 1 0
HARTLAW LLP 1 1
HART BROWN LLP 1 0
HARRISON CLARK RICKERBYS LIMITED 2 1
HARRISON CLARK (WORCESTER) LLP 1 0
HARPER & ODELL 1 1
HARGREAVES MOUNTENEY LIMITED 1 1
Hansells 1 1
HANNE & CO SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
HANNAH SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
Guthrie Jones Jones Llp 1 1
GUNNERCOOKE LLP 1 1
GT STEWART LIMITED 3 1
GRAINGER APPLEYARD SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
GRAHAM & ROSEN LIMITED 1 0
GOODMAN DERRICK LLP 1 0
GLP SOLICITORS 1 0
GLOVER PRIEST SOLICITORS LIMITED 2 2
GLOBE WAREING CROPPER 1 1
GLANVILLES DAMANT LIMITED 1 1
GLAISYERS SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
GIRLINGS SOLICITORS LLP 1 1

If you cannot see any information relating to a decision you have selected above, the ombudsman decided that no remedy was required in the case