Ombudsman decision data

We publish data about the final decisions made by ombudsman.

Our Policy Statement sets out why we publish this information.

This data is updated on a rolling quarterly basis and most of our decisions will be published in the quarter after the decision was made.

Each decision remains published for 12 months from the date of publication.

Included in the table below are details of the ombudsman decisions made between 1 October 2024 – 30 September 2025.

The CSV file for this information can be found here.

How to use this information


General information

The information in the table below shows:

  • Name of the service provider.
  • Total decisions about the service provider in the last 12 months.

Click on the name to find the details of each complaint.



Choosing a service provider

This information can be used to look at the record of service providers. When you look at the information it's useful to ask:

  • Does a complaint mean the firm provides poor service?

No. It's important to check the data and see if we decided whether the service was reasonable or not.

Also take into account that everyone makes mistakes from time to time. When this happens it is important how the service provider responds to the complaint. The data will also show you whether we thought their own (first-tier) complaints handling process was reasonable or not. You should be able to find information about their complaints process on their website.

  • How big is the provider?

If a provider has more than one complaint with us, it could be because they are a big provider and deal with thousands of cases. In this situation it is not unusual for them to have a few complaints listed with us. Always look at the decision we make, not just the number of complaints.

  • What type of work do they do? 

We know that some legal work, such as personal injury, litigation and criminal work, can be more complex for people to understand and the outcomes might not be what people want. This means that complaints could be more likely, but always check what the outcome of the complaint was first.



Downloading data

If this information is used, for example on comparison sites, we encourage you to signpost to the Legal Ombudsman so consumers have the opportunity to find out more about the complaints data.

 


Please click on the green cross in the table below and this will give you more information about the legal service provider and the total decisions made in the last 12 months.

You will find the green cross in front of the name of the legal service provider.

In the table below, the ‘ombudsman remedy required’ field will be 0 if:

  • the ombudsman did not propose a remedy or

  • the remedy proposed by the ombudsman was equal to, or less than, the remedy offered by the firm before we investigated the complaint.

Where data says N/A, this means the ombudsman found the provider’s service to be reasonable.

Filter results by area of law

Number of firms: 738

Number of decisions: 1043

Name Number Of Decisions Ombudsman Remedy Required
MLL Limited 3 3
MKB SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
MJP CONVEYANCING LIMITED 1 0
MIYA Limited 1 0
MITCHELLS 1 0
Miss Yvonne Mary Healing of 18 St John Street 1 1
Miss Tanya Rosemary Jones of Magdalen Chambers 1 1
Miss Larysa Simak of 12 Old Square Chambers 1 1
Miss Karen Rosalie Boyes of Erimus Chambers 1 1
Miss Joy Brereton of 4 Paper Bldgs 1 0
Miss Hannah Rose Gomersall of Coram Chambers 1 0
Miss Clare Elizabeth Fear of Albion Chambers 1 0
Miss Catherine Eileen Hewitt of Quartz Barristers Chambers 1 0
Miss Anna Claire Ratcliffe of Coram Chambers 1 1
MIR LEGAL LTD 1 1
MINSTER LAW LIMITED 10 8
MILLS & REEVE LLP 1 0
Miles Preston 1 1
MILES & PARTNERS LLP 1 0
MICHAEL TAYLOR & CO 1 0
Michael Day Licensed Conveyancers 1 1
MFG SOLICITORS LLP 2 1
METAMORPH LAW LTD 2 2
MERRILS EDE 1 1
MERIDIAN PRIVATE CLIENT LLP 2 2
Merali Beedle Limited 1 1
MELLOR SOLICITORS LIMITED 2 2
Mellen & Co. Limited 1 1
MEABY & CO SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
ME LAW 1 1
MB LEGAL SERVICES LIMITED 1 1
MAYA & CO SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
MAXWELL HODGE LIMITED 1 1
MAWDSLEYS 1 1
Marshall Hall Levy Limited 1 1
MARSDEN RAWSTHORN SOLICITORS LIMITED 2 1
Market Street Law Limited 1 1
MARK SWATTS MORSE LLP 2 2
MARK ABBOTT SOLICITORS 3 3
MANDY PETERS SOLICITORS 1 1
MANDER HADLEY & CO 1 0
MALEKIN LAW LIMITED 1 0
MAJORLAW LIMITED 1 1
MAJ LAW LIMITED 3 0
MADDOX LEGAL LIMITED 1 1
M S SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
LYSANDER LAW LIMITED 1 0
LYONS DAVIDSON LIMITED 7 3
LYNCH HALL & HORNBY 1 1
LPC LAW LTD 1 0
LOWE`S SOLICITORS 1 0
LOUND MULRENAN JEFFERIES SOLICITORS 1 1
LOSS LEGAL SERVICES LTD 2 1
LMK LAW 1 1
LM TRUSTEES LIMITED 1 1
LLOYD PLATT & COMPANY LTD 1 0
LINNITTS SOLICITORS LLP 3 3
LINDER MYERS LLP 2 2
LIBERTY SOLICITORS 1 0
LIBERTY LEGAL SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
LIA SOLICITORS 1 0
LEXTON LAW SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
LEWIS ONIONS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
LEVI SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
LEIGH DAY 1 0
LEGAL NATIONAL LIMITED 1 1
LEGAL COMFORT ASSOCIATES LIMITED 1 0
LEEDS DAY LLP 1 1
LEECH & CO SOLICITORS LIMITED 3 0
LEE BOLTON MONIER-WILLIAMS LLP 1 1
LEE & COMPANY 1 1
LEDGISTERS LIMITED 1 1
LEADENHALL LAW GROUP LTD 1 1
LAYTONS LLP 1 1
LAWTEC SOLICITORS 2 2
LAWMATIC SOLICITORS 2 0
LAWDIT SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
LAWCOMMERCIAL TRADING LIMITED 2 2
LAW LANE SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
Law Direct Limited 1 1
LAVEER LEGAL LIMITED 1 1
LATIMER LEE SOLICITORS LIMITED 2 2
LARGE & GIBSON 1 0
LAMBERT PUGH LLP 2 2
LAM & MEERABUX SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
LAKE JACKSON 1 1
L R SOLICITORS 1 0
KYRIAKIDES & BRAIER 1 1
KNOWLES BENNING LLP 1 1
KNOCKER & FOSKETT 1 1
Knights Professional Services Limited 2 0
Knight Richardson Limited 1 0
KIRWANS 1 1
KINGSLEY NAPLEY LLP 1 0
KINGSFORDS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
Kings Court Trust Ltd 2 2
KIDWELLS LAW SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
KIDD RAPINET LLP 1 1
KHOKHAR SOLICITORS 1 1
KHAN MATHER LTD 1 1

If you cannot see any information relating to a decision you have selected above, the ombudsman decided that no remedy was required in the case