Ombudsman decision data

We publish data about the final decisions made by ombudsman.

Our Policy Statement sets out why we publish this information.

This data is updated on a rolling quarterly basis and most of our decisions will be published in the quarter after the decision was made.

Each decision remains published for 12 months from the date of publication.

Included in the table below are details of the ombudsman decisions made between 1 October 2024 – 30 September 2025.

The CSV file for this information can be found here.

How to use this information


General information

The information in the table below shows:

  • Name of the service provider.
  • Total decisions about the service provider in the last 12 months.

Click on the name to find the details of each complaint.



Choosing a service provider

This information can be used to look at the record of service providers. When you look at the information it's useful to ask:

  • Does a complaint mean the firm provides poor service?

No. It's important to check the data and see if we decided whether the service was reasonable or not.

Also take into account that everyone makes mistakes from time to time. When this happens it is important how the service provider responds to the complaint. The data will also show you whether we thought their own (first-tier) complaints handling process was reasonable or not. You should be able to find information about their complaints process on their website.

  • How big is the provider?

If a provider has more than one complaint with us, it could be because they are a big provider and deal with thousands of cases. In this situation it is not unusual for them to have a few complaints listed with us. Always look at the decision we make, not just the number of complaints.

  • What type of work do they do? 

We know that some legal work, such as personal injury, litigation and criminal work, can be more complex for people to understand and the outcomes might not be what people want. This means that complaints could be more likely, but always check what the outcome of the complaint was first.



Downloading data

If this information is used, for example on comparison sites, we encourage you to signpost to the Legal Ombudsman so consumers have the opportunity to find out more about the complaints data.

 


Please click on the green cross in the table below and this will give you more information about the legal service provider and the total decisions made in the last 12 months.

You will find the green cross in front of the name of the legal service provider.

In the table below, the ‘ombudsman remedy required’ field will be 0 if:

  • the ombudsman did not propose a remedy or

  • the remedy proposed by the ombudsman was equal to, or less than, the remedy offered by the firm before we investigated the complaint.

Where data says N/A, this means the ombudsman found the provider’s service to be reasonable.

Filter results by area of law

Number of firms: 738

Number of decisions: 1043

Name Number Of Decisions Ombudsman Remedy Required
Jones Whyte LLP 1 0
JUDGE SYKES FRIXOU LIMITED 1 0
KAYSON SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
KEITH DYSON SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
KEITH FLOWER & CO 1 0
KERSEYS SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
KESAR & CO LTD 1 0
KEW LAW LLP 1 0
KINGSFORDS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
KINGSLEY NAPLEY LLP 1 0
Knight Richardson Limited 1 0
Knights Professional Services Limited 2 0
L R SOLICITORS 1 0
LARGE & GIBSON 1 0
LAWDIT SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
LAWMATIC SOLICITORS 2 0
LEECH & CO SOLICITORS LIMITED 3 0
LEGAL COMFORT ASSOCIATES LIMITED 1 0
LEIGH DAY 1 0
LEVI SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
LEWIS ONIONS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
LIA SOLICITORS 1 0
LIBERTY LEGAL SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
LIBERTY SOLICITORS 1 0
LLOYD PLATT & COMPANY LTD 1 0
LOWE`S SOLICITORS 1 0
LPC LAW LTD 1 0
LYSANDER LAW LIMITED 1 0
M S SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
MAJ LAW LIMITED 3 0
MALEKIN LAW LIMITED 1 0
MANDER HADLEY & CO 1 0
MICHAEL TAYLOR & CO 1 0
MILES & PARTNERS LLP 1 0
MILLS & REEVE LLP 1 0
Miss Catherine Eileen Hewitt of Quartz Barristers Chambers 1 0
Miss Clare Elizabeth Fear of Albion Chambers 1 0
Miss Hannah Rose Gomersall of Coram Chambers 1 0
Miss Joy Brereton of 4 Paper Bldgs 1 0
MITCHELLS 1 0
MIYA Limited 1 0
MJP CONVEYANCING LIMITED 1 0
MONACO SOLICITORS LTD 1 0
MORECROFTS LLP 1 0
MORTONS LAW LIMITED 1 0
Mr Adam John Dutton Budworth of 2 Bedford Row 1 0
Mr Andrew Buchan of Cloisters 1 0
Mr Balahl Khan of The Barrister Group (Taunton) 1 0
Mr Christopher Bryan Jeyes of Drystone Chambers 1 0
Mr Christopher James Yuen Kang Bryden of 4 King's Bench Walk 1 0
Mr Haresh Sood of Haresh Sood Law Chambers 1 0
Mr John Patrick King of 9 Bedford Row 1 0
Mr John William Nathaniel Rundall of 1GC|Family Law 1 0
Mr Joseph John Bela Leslie Giret of 1EC Barristers 1 0
Mr Mohammed Omar Faruk of 19 Coombewood Drive 1 0
Mr Peter Anthony Corrigan of Mountford Chambers 1 0
Mr Philip Arnes Bowen of The Barrister Group (Taunton) 1 0
Mr Simon William Edward Charles of St Johns Buildings 1 0
Mrs Anjulika Vatish of 3 Bolt Court 1 0
Ms Amratpal Kaur Matharu of 12 Old Square Chambers 1 0
Ms Ceri Ann White of 4 Paper Bldgs 1 0
Ms Ella Cantor-Freedman of The Barrister Group (Taunton) 1 0
NALDERS LLP 1 0
NATHAN & CO 1 0
New Homes Law Ltd 2 0
NEWNHAM & JORDAN SOLICITORS LTD 1 0
Nicholson Jones Sutton Solicitors Ltd 1 0
NOBLE SOLICITORS 1 0
O'NEILL PATIENT SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
Oakwood Solicitors Limited 1 0
Parfitt Cresswell 1 0
PARIS SMITH LLP 1 0
PARKVIEW SOLICITORS LTD 1 0
PARSONAGE & CO SOLICITORS 1 0
PENMAN SEDGWICK LLP 1 0
PENNINGTONS MANCHES COOPER LLP 1 0
Perduco Law Group LLP 1 0
PETER DUNN & CO LIMITED 1 0
PORTER DODSON LLP 2 0
POWELL & COMPANY SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
PRAKTICE LEGAL 1 0
PRINCIPIA LAW LIMITED 1 0
QORE LEGAL LTD 1 0
QUINN MELVILLE BARROW LLP 1 0
RAMSDENS SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
RAPHAEL LAW LIMITED 1 0
REDFERNS LIMITED 1 0
Renier Gillies Limited 1 0
RICHARD NELSON LLP 1 0
RIDLEY AND HALL LEGAL LIMITED 1 0
RLK SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
RMNJ SOLICITORS 1 0
ROBERTS SOLICITORS LIMITED 2 0
ROGER BROOKER & CO 1 0
RONALD FLETCHER & CO LLP 1 0
ROSE & ROSE SOLICITORS LLP 2 0
ROWBERRY MORRIS THAMES VALLEY LLP 1 0
ROYTHORNES LIMITED 1 0
Rubin Lewis O'Brien LLP 1 0
RUSSELL & RUSSELL SOLICITORS LLP 1 0

If you cannot see any information relating to a decision you have selected above, the ombudsman decided that no remedy was required in the case