Ombudsman decision data

We publish data about the final decisions made by our ombudsmen.

Our Policy Statement sets out why we publish this information.

This data is updated on a rolling quarterly basis and most of our decisions will be published in the quarter after the decision was made.

Each decision remains published for 12 months from the date of publication.

Included in the table below are details of the ombudsman decisions made between 1 July 2025 – 30 June 2026.

The CSV file for this information can be found here.

How to use this information


General information

The information in the table below shows:

  • Name of the service provider.
  • Total decisions about the service provider in the last 12 months.

Click on the name to find the details of each complaint.



Choosing a service provider

This information can be used to look at the record of service providers. When you look at the information it's useful to ask:

  • Does a complaint mean the firm provides poor service?

No. It's important to check the data and see if we decided whether the service was reasonable or not.

Also take into account that everyone makes mistakes from time to time. When this happens it is important how the service provider responds to the complaint. The data will also show you whether we thought their own (first-tier) complaints handling process was reasonable or not. You should be able to find information about their complaints process on their website.

  • How big is the provider?

If a provider has more than one complaint with us, it could be because they are a big provider and deal with thousands of cases. In this situation it is not unusual for them to have a few complaints listed with us. Always look at the decision we make, not just the number of complaints.

  • What type of work do they do? 

We know that some legal work, such as personal injury, litigation and criminal work, can be more complex for people to understand and the outcomes might not be what people want. This means that complaints could be more likely, but always check what the outcome of the complaint was first.



Downloading data

If this information is used, for example on comparison sites, we encourage you to signpost to the Legal Ombudsman so consumers have the opportunity to find out more about the complaints data.

 


Please click on the green cross in the table below and this will give you more information about the legal service provider and the total decisions made in the last 12 months.

You will find the green cross in front of the name of the legal service provider.

In the table below, the ‘ombudsman remedy required’ field will be 0 if:

  • the ombudsman did not propose a remedy or

  • the remedy proposed by the ombudsman was equal to, or less than, the remedy offered by the firm before we investigated the complaint.

Where data says N/A, this means the ombudsman found the provider’s service to be reasonable.

Filter results by area of law

Number of firms: 642

Number of decisions: 887

Name Number Of Decisions Ombudsman Remedy Required
Leading Property Lawyers Limited 1 0
LEIGH DAY 1 0
LIVERPOOL LEGAL SERVICES LTD 1 0
LONDON CORPORATE LEGAL LIMITED 1 0
LONGMORES SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
LUX LAW LIMITED 1 0
M8 Trading LTD 1 0
MAJ LAW LIMITED 2 0
MAKWANA SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
MANDER CRUICKSHANK SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
MARIEL IRVINE 1 0
MCHALE LEGAL LIMITED 1 0
MCKENZIE LAW LIMITED 1 0
MENZIES LAW LIMITED 1 0
MFG SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
MICHELMORES LLP 1 0
MILLER ROSENFALCK LLP 2 0
MILLS & REEVE LLP 1 0
Miss Archna Dawar 1 0
Miss Catherine Eileen Hewitt of Quartz Barristers Chambers 1 0
Miss Hannah Rose Gomersall of Coram Chambers 1 0
Miss Sally Harrison of St Johns Buildings 1 0
Miss Samantha Kane of Holland Park Chambers 1 0
Miss Sarah Tiffany Munro of St Mary's Family Law Chambers 1 0
MITCHELLS 1 0
MIYA Limited 2 0
MJP CONVEYANCING LIMITED 1 0
MOORE BARLOW LLP 1 0
MORECROFTS LLP 1 0
Mr Adam John Dutton Budworth of 2 Bedford Row 1 0
Mr Adrian Henry Peck of 12CP 1 0
Mr Balahl Khan of The Barrister Group (Taunton) 1 0
Mr Carl David Fender of Bank House Chambers 1 0
Mr Charles Daniel Harman of 15 Winckley Square 1 0
Mr Christopher Bryan Jeyes of Drystone Chambers 1 0
Mr Christopher Stephen Moss of St Johns Buildings 1 0
Mr Haresh Sood of Haresh Sood Law Chambers 1 0
Mr Ian Anthony Stebbings of Deka Chambers 1 0
Mr John Patrick King of 9 Bedford Row 1 0
Mr Joseph John Bela Leslie Giret of 1EC Barristers 1 0
Mr Liam Michael Ryan of 7BR 1 0
Mr Michael David Collard of 5 Pump Court 1 0
Mr Michael Stephen Cane-Soothill of Bank House Chambers 1 0
Mr Omar Sherif Ensaff of No5 Chambers 1 0
Mr Sarbjit Singh Boora of Cornwall Street Barristers 1 0
Mr Simon Howard Brilliant of Lamb Chambers 1 0
Mr Simon William Edward Charles of St Johns Buildings 1 0
Ms Ceri Ann White of 4 Paper Bldgs 1 0
Ms Lucy Keane of 3PB Barristers 1 0
Mullis & Peake LLP 1 0
MWG Solicitors Limited 1 0
New Homes Law Ltd 1 0
Nicholson Jones Sutton Solicitors Ltd 1 0
Oakwood Solicitors Limited 1 0
Optimal Solicitors Ltd 2 0
PARIS SMITH LLP 1 0
PARKINSON WRIGHT LLP 1 0
PAUL ROBINSON SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
PCS Legal Limited 2 0
PENDER LAW LIMITED 1 0
PHG LEGAL LIMITED 2 0
RAMSDENS SOLICITORS LLP 2 0
RICHARD GRIFFITHS & CO 1 0
RKS SOLICITORS (DEWSBURY) LTD 1 0
ROBERTS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
RONALD FLETCHER & CO LLP 1 0
ROWBERRY MORRIS THAMES VALLEY LLP 1 0
Sam Hawking Property Lawyers Ltd 2 0
SAMUEL PHILLIPS LAW FIRM 1 0
SEDDONS GSC LLP 1 0
Shah Law Chambers Ltd 1 0
Sheehan Legal Services Limited 1 0
SILLS & BETTERIDGE LLP 2 0
SIMON BETHEL SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
SIMONS RODKIN SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
SMITH & CO SOLICITORS 1 0
SOLOMON SOLICITORS 1 0
SOMERFIELD & CO LIMITED 1 0
SPENCERS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
SPRING AND CO SOLICITORS LTD 1 0
ST ANDREW TRUSTEES LIMITED 1 0
STEPHENS SCOWN LLP 1 0
STEPHENS WILMOT LTD 1 0
STEPHENSONS SOLICITORS LLP 2 0
STREATHERS HIGHGATE LLP 1 0
SUMMERFIELD BROWNE LIMITED 1 0
SWIFT LAWYERS LIMITED 1 0
SYDNEY MITCHELL LLP 2 0
TAJ MUGHAL LIMITED 1 0
TALBOT WALKER LLP 1 0
TAYLOR & EMMET LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP 1 0
THE D M PARTNERSHIP 1 0
THE WILKES PARTNERSHIP LLP 1 0
THOMSON SNELL & PASSMORE LLP 1 0
THOMSON WEBB & CORFIELD LLP 1 0
THRINGS LLP 1 0
THURSFIELDS LEGAL LIMITED 1 0
TREADSTONE LAW LIMITED 1 0
UMBRELLA LEGAL LIMITED 1 0
V. E. WHITE & CO. LTD 1 0

If you cannot see any information relating to a decision you have selected above, the ombudsman decided that no remedy was required in the case