Ombudsman decision data

We publish data about the final decisions made by ombudsman.

Our Policy Statement sets out why we publish this information.

This data is updated on a rolling quarterly basis and most of our decisions will be published in the quarter after the decision was made.

Each decision remains published for 12 months from the date of publication.

Included in the table below are details of the ombudsman decisions made between 1 October 2024 – 30 September 2025.

The CSV file for this information can be found here.

How to use this information


General information

The information in the table below shows:

  • Name of the service provider.
  • Total decisions about the service provider in the last 12 months.

Click on the name to find the details of each complaint.



Choosing a service provider

This information can be used to look at the record of service providers. When you look at the information it's useful to ask:

  • Does a complaint mean the firm provides poor service?

No. It's important to check the data and see if we decided whether the service was reasonable or not.

Also take into account that everyone makes mistakes from time to time. When this happens it is important how the service provider responds to the complaint. The data will also show you whether we thought their own (first-tier) complaints handling process was reasonable or not. You should be able to find information about their complaints process on their website.

  • How big is the provider?

If a provider has more than one complaint with us, it could be because they are a big provider and deal with thousands of cases. In this situation it is not unusual for them to have a few complaints listed with us. Always look at the decision we make, not just the number of complaints.

  • What type of work do they do? 

We know that some legal work, such as personal injury, litigation and criminal work, can be more complex for people to understand and the outcomes might not be what people want. This means that complaints could be more likely, but always check what the outcome of the complaint was first.



Downloading data

If this information is used, for example on comparison sites, we encourage you to signpost to the Legal Ombudsman so consumers have the opportunity to find out more about the complaints data.

 


Please click on the green cross in the table below and this will give you more information about the legal service provider and the total decisions made in the last 12 months.

You will find the green cross in front of the name of the legal service provider.

In the table below, the ‘ombudsman remedy required’ field will be 0 if:

  • the ombudsman did not propose a remedy or

  • the remedy proposed by the ombudsman was equal to, or less than, the remedy offered by the firm before we investigated the complaint.

Where data says N/A, this means the ombudsman found the provider’s service to be reasonable.

Filter results by area of law

Number of firms: 738

Number of decisions: 1043

Name Number Of Decisions Ombudsman Remedy Required
Mr John McLanachan 15 14
BEAUMONT ABS LTD 10 10
IRWIN MITCHELL LLP 10 5
MINSTER LAW LIMITED 10 8
Ackroyd Legal (London) LLP 9 9
Axiom Ince Limited 9 7
ERIC SMITH LAW LIMITED 9 9
NIGEL BROADHEAD MYNARD 9 9
LYONS DAVIDSON LIMITED 7 3
STOWE FAMILY LAW LLP 7 1
Taylor Rose Limited 7 3
CARPENTERS LIMITED 6 5
DAVISONS SOLICITORS LIMITED 6 5
OPTIMA LEGAL SERVICES LIMITED 6 4
Slater and Gordon UK Limited 6 3
Jarmans Solicitors (JS) Limited 5 5
SIMPSON MILLAR LLP 5 3
STEVE DAVIES SOLICITORS LTD 5 5
Connect2Law Limited 4 4
COODES LLP 4 2
CUTHBERTSONS 4 4
DUNCAN LEWIS SOLICITORS LTD 4 2
Giles Wilson Law Limited 4 2
JMW SOLICITORS LLP 4 2
Morr & Co LLP 4 3
NEWMANS SOLICITORS LIMITED 4 2
PCS Legal Limited 4 3
Read Roper & Read Solicitors Limited 4 4
STEPHENSONS SOLICITORS LLP 4 1
WBW SOLICITORS LLP 4 1
AGEAS LAW LLP 3 1
ARAG LAW LIMITED 3 1
ASHFORDS LLP 3 0
BERRY SMITH LLP 3 0
Bespoke Law Services (UK) Limited 3 3
BPL SOLICITORS LIMITED 3 3
CLARKE WILLMOTT LLP 3 0
CO-OPERATIVE LEGAL SERVICES LIMITED 3 1
DLG LEGAL SERVICES LIMITED 3 3
EDMONDS MARSHALL MCMAHON LTD 3 1
EMG SOLICITORS LIMITED 3 2
EQUILAW LIMITED 3 1
GT STEWART LIMITED 3 1
HCB SOLICITORS LTD 3 0
HCR Legal LLP 3 1
HODDERS LAW LIMITED 3 2
ISON HARRISON LIMITED 3 2
LEECH & CO SOLICITORS LIMITED 3 0
LINNITTS SOLICITORS LLP 3 3
MAJ LAW LIMITED 3 0
MARK ABBOTT SOLICITORS 3 3
MLL Limited 3 3
Mr Graeme Wood 3 1
Mr Peter Wareing of Bell Yard Chambers 3 2
NEWLAW LEGAL LIMITED 3 1
PM PROPERTY LAWYERS LIMITED 3 3
SANDERS WITHERSPOON LLP 3 2
SSB Group Limited 3 2
VEALE WASBROUGH VIZARDS LLP 3 3
WATSON RAMSBOTTOM LIMITED 3 2
ADMIRAL LAW LIMITED 2 2
AFG LAW LIMITED 2 1
ALISON LAW SOLICITORS LLP 2 2
Allchurch Property Lawyers Limited 2 2
BERRY & LAMBERTS LLP 2 2
BHATIA BEST LIMITED 2 0
BIRKETTS LLP 2 1
BLAKEWELLS SOLICITORS LIMITED 2 1
BLANCHARDS BAILEY LLP 2 0
Blanchards Law Ltd 2 1
BRIDGER & CO LIMITED 2 2
Cavendish Law 2 2
CAVERSHAM SOLICITORS LIMITED 2 2
CHAMBERLINS 2 2
CHARSLEY HARRISON LLP 2 2
CHATTERTONS LEGAL SERVICES LIMITED 2 1
Convey Law Ltd. 2 1
DFL Conveyancing Limited 2 1
DPH LEGAL LIMITED 2 2
EATON SMITH LLP 2 2
F W MEGGITT & CO LTD 2 2
FORWARD & YUSSUF SOLICITORS 2 2
FOSTERS SOLICITORS LLP 2 0
FRANKLINS SOLICITORS LLP 2 2
GEORGE IDE LLP 2 0
GLOVER PRIEST SOLICITORS LIMITED 2 2
HARRISON CLARK RICKERBYS LIMITED 2 1
Hennah Haywood Law Ltd 2 1
HENRY HYAMS LIMITED 2 1
HERRINGTON CARMICHAEL LLP 2 1
Holden Smith Law Limited 2 2
HOWELLS LEGAL LIMITED 2 1
HUGH JAMES 2 1
IRVINGS LAW LIMITED 2 2
JMR SOLICITORS LTD 2 2
JOHN W DAVIES LEGAL LIMITED 2 2
Kings Court Trust Ltd 2 2
Knights Professional Services Limited 2 0
LAMBERT PUGH LLP 2 2
LATIMER LEE SOLICITORS LIMITED 2 2

If you cannot see any information relating to a decision you have selected above, the ombudsman decided that no remedy was required in the case